Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tschneidereit

tschneidereit

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 23, 2014, 5:48 PM UTC
HN karma
131
Public activity
40 items

About tschneidereit

WebAssembly & Components & WASI @ Akamai. Started and help lead the Bytecode Alliance.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48554230

    Oh, no worries at all—it happens!

  2. comment
    Comment #48488363

    [Creator of the StarlingMonkey JS runtime here] > It works in the browser already, by bundling another browser runtime engine into wasm. Note that that's not how JCO works: JCO unb…

  3. comment
    Comment #29476284

    Oh, no worries at all! While there was no acquisition involved, a whole group of folks working on WebAssembly at Mozilla (myself included) moved to Fastly last Fall. What I tried t…

  4. comment
    Comment #29471379

    It's really the other way around: we joined Fastly because we knew it's a place where we could do this kind of work in the open. None of the code involved here existed a year ago, …

  5. comment
    Comment #21522598

    That is how we support references in the Rust toolchain right now, via wasm-bindgen, and it's an important part of making unforgable references work for languages that rely on line…

  6. comment
    Comment #21519073

    Agreed, and there are a lot of UX questions to sort out. Many security concepts took many attempts to figure out in full (or to the extent that they have been figured out :)) One i…

  7. comment
    Comment #21519001

    Indeed: that and many other things are prior art in this space. And there is a lot of prior art for what we're working on—this is not meant as an academic research project! :)

  8. comment
    Comment #21518614

    What you're describing will indeed be introduced with the WebAssembly GC proposal: https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc For languages that can express unforgeable pointers as first-cl…

  9. comment
    Comment #21516962

    To expand on this, capabilities allow us to go further than pledge(2): it enables selective forwarding of capabilities to other nanoprocesses, such as only forwarding a handle to a…

  10. comment
    Comment #21516802

    And Wasmtime will also support both of those. Support for environments in which JITting is not an option is of course really important to this!

  11. comment
    Comment #19503292

    We're working on that, too :) See this post from last Fall where we laid out a way to think about where WebAssembly is going, which use cases to enable, and how: https://hacks.mozi…

  12. comment
    Comment #19503260

    Good news: we fully agree with these goals! On 1, the libc we're working on[1] is based on musl. It won't ever be 100% compatible with all code, because that runs into constraints …

  13. comment
    Comment #19502246

    Oh, this is amazing!

  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #19502005

    We've mainly based the current design on CloudABI/Capsicum, but it's all early days, and Fuchsia is on our list of systems to at the very least take heavy inspiration from :)

  16. comment
    Comment #19501982

    (Member of the team at Mozilla here ) Yes, that's the list. And the layout of structs, strings, etc is up to the compiler, within the bounds of the restrictions WebAssembly imposes…

  17. comment
    Comment #16875304

    This is indeed a problem for Wasm/JS integration. The JS WeakRef proposal[1] will address it for many use cases, and the WebAssembly GC proposal[2], combined with JS Typed Objects[…

  18. comment
    Comment #13562128

    Intermittently failing tests are a problem that all large code bases have, regardless of the used language. See for example this post about Google's code base[1], which is largely …

  19. comment
    Comment #13521609

    That last part doesn't work, unfortunately. We looked into doing exactly that, but the way history navigation works is specified quite strictly - and relied upon by existing web co…

  20. comment
    Comment #13521586

    See my reply in another conversation thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13520978

  21. comment
    Comment #13520978

    (Member of the browser.html team here) There's a section at the end about how we got to this approach. You're right that there isn't too much detail there, though. In short, resear…

  22. comment
    Comment #12015271

    Things like history management. While tabs in browser.html are just iframes, browser.html needs more access to the contained documents to be able to fully do its job. For security …

  23. comment
    Comment #9052577

    EME is a way to add DRM support to html5 video, but it's not compatible with Flash's DRM system, so can't directly be used to implement that.

  24. comment
    Comment #9052571

    Thanks, bug filed: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133323

  25. comment
    Comment #9049957

    Can you give steps to reproduce this crash? It should definitely not happen. In fact, until https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558184 is implemented we rely on an install…