Viewing profile — tryeng
tryeng
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 14, 2010, 2:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tryeng
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9580080
An annoyance, yes it is. But I think it's a good feature. Not making mistakes is the most important thing to improve your touch typing speed. If this annoying behavior makes you sl…
-
comment
Comment #9003694
Base jumping!
-
comment
Comment #7145721
You can of course do this trick in any base. If we choose e.g. base 2^n for the n-th row of pascals triangle, we can use the following code for getting the n-th row of pascals tria…
-
comment
Comment #5446443
Hi, I see that I misread the "In order to retrieve the original password a hacker has to crack multiple hashes instead of only one." as your argument, not an example of a false arg…
-
comment
Comment #5445580
Then I guess we might agree. The only advantage I know of with bcrypt over multple SHA2 is that GPUs are very bad at it compared to most hashing functions, so the CPU cost (on my s…
-
comment
Comment #5445196
[Replying to ajanuary] Thank you, now I actually do see your point. I would still not think of it a considerable weakness. To find such a collision would take more time than brutef…
-
comment
Comment #5444992
"With a single round of hashing, there are two possible inputs A1 and A2 that can produce the final output O." No, there is an infinite number of inputs that produce the final outp…
-
comment
Comment #5444835
You can increase the number of rounds of hashing as well, without rewriting your code. I can't argue with your last point, simply because I don't understand it. How exactly does th…
-
comment
Comment #5444742
His advice is good, but that's still no excuse for making invalid arguments for what he is advocating. Edit: In fact, if I hadn't heard of bcrypt before and saw that article, I wou…
-
comment
Comment #5444719
I'm not saying that that bcrypt isn't a better choice, it is, but some of the "flaws" he is pointing out in that article are just ridiculous. If he's going to argue for something, …
-
comment
Comment #5444275
That's not a good article to make people read. I find it strange that it doesn't mention lack of salting among the most common mistakes. Also, I didn't think SHA1 broken in any way…
- story
-
comment
Comment #4513567
Compression itself in a cryptographic protocol is not the issue here. The problem starts when you let an attacker add chosen plain-text before or after the secret in the same compr…
-
comment
Comment #4258714
I don't believe it is a poor justification. It is a name chosen for this particular set of numbers. In fact, every name we've put on things in mathematics is "by definition". Real …
-
comment
Comment #3889504
Well, the DCPU-16 does too: http://www.reddit.com/r/dcpu16/comments/sripk/rfe_dcpu16_v13...
-
comment
Comment #3752899
No, it's just lack of security. There's no obscurity involved at all. (And, if there was any doubt, we should of course not count on people being nice on the internet.)
-
comment
Comment #3743018
Nope. Security through niceness and ethics. If everyone was in on it we would have a really great society.
-
comment
Comment #2327356
I don't think your PCI guy is overly strict. It's pretty clear that the intentions of the requirements are what you described. What might have worked, though, is to have virtual ma…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1979310
JPEG artifacts on the logo, The arrow images left to "Cloud", "Open", "Social" and "Secure" are not antialiased. The arrow in the search box is below the center of the box, and lot…