Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — troll24601

troll24601

HN member
Joined
Wed, Dec 14, 2011, 10:12 PM UTC
HN karma
94
Public activity
53 items

About troll24601

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #3488386

    Arrests for large-scale commercial copyright infringement and money laundering schemes aren't new. This simply isn't an example freedom getting more and more restricted.

  2. comment
    Comment #3488133

    > however I unaware evidence in support of this Read the indictment. It contains evidence of this (amongst other issues).

  3. comment
    Comment #3488110

    Thank you. It's nice that at least ONE person recognized that maybe their uninformed reaction to a short article might not be 100% correct, and was willing to go read the indictmen…

  4. comment
    Comment #3488089

    > I think you don't realize that my comment was a response to noonespecial: First they come for the sites that are 90/10 pirate to legit. ... When will it be too much? When does it…

  5. comment
  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #3487648

    You are grossly misconstruing the nature of the emails whilst avoiding the other points entirely. Read the indictment.

  8. comment
    Comment #3487644

    If you'd read the indictment you'd know this has nothing to do with the government monitoring the Internet. Sadly you were too busy comparing the enforcement of long existing laws …

  9. comment
    Comment #3487352

    Nothing about this case makes me fear your future. I read the indictment. The cause for fear simply isn't there. It's useless to pretend you're keeping an eye on the government whe…

  10. comment
    Comment #3487301

    KIM DOTCOM is a convicted criminal. (securities fraud, embezzling, and some other crap) He's about to be tried again, for another crime. But he's already a criminal. The person I r…

  11. comment
    Comment #3487261

    Your first two numbered points are not even close to true. If you bothered to read the indictment, you'd know this. Sadly, you (like most of HN) are raging without bothering to get…

  12. comment
    Comment #3487244

    If you bothered to read the indictment, you'd see they weren't complying and that they were actively facilitating.

  13. comment
    Comment #3487229

    I'm pretty sure that the Feds didn't get copies of emails from Eric Schmidt saying that they need to fix the audio/video synchronization on the Sopranos... or that they need to rat…

  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #3487207

    It's disgusting that you chose to reappropriate that quote in this context. If you read the indictment, it's clear that this was the purposeful monetization of pirated material. It…

  16. comment
  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #3486058

    I'm not an investor, but I've had a parallel experience having been involved with roughly 150 tech contracts in my career. A strong predictor for mediocrity is when communication i…

  19. comment
  20. comment
  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #3481863

    So to clarify: if you do work with the intent of selling it to one buyer it should be protected, but if you do work with the intent of selling it to two or more buyers it should no…

  23. comment
    Comment #3481470

    I assume that once you pitch designs to one of your clients, it's fine with you if they photograph it, copy it, and never pay you a dime? People love design, and do great design wi…

  24. comment
    Comment #3476110

    The bill did pass. The ACLU and the Supreme Court got rid of it.

  25. comment
    Comment #3472569

    This is typical for how Postgres adds features and functionalities. They tend to add a new core feature in one release, then add adjacent functionality and performance improvements…