Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — treysis

treysis

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 16, 2019, 6:51 PM UTC
HN karma
25
Public activity
15 items

About treysis

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #26692458

    Seems like all German accounts with 8-digit phone numbers are missing. Only 7-digit number accounts are shown.

  2. comment
    Comment #24059673

    Some use it because it simplifies load balancing if you're thinking network-design in an IPv4-way.

  3. comment
    Comment #24059594

    Yes. It offers better scalability! E.g. at my university, our institute has its own IPv4 /24. That means a maximum of ~253 or so devices. We have exhausted that number and for ever…

  4. comment
    Comment #24059527

    He didn't say "all", he said "many". And that is factually right. Many ISPs use DSLite/CGNAT and don't hand out public IPv4 addresses to their customers anymore. Yes, some offer th…

  5. comment
    Comment #21813112

    Yes, it seems like it is behind the times. It doesn't matter much at the moment, as there are no real IPv6-only services of relevance (unless you need to connect to the private IPv…

  6. comment
    Comment #21809342

    But you don't need PTR in any of these steps.

  7. comment
    Comment #21809315

    That just proves you haven't understood IPv6 yet. ULA addresses make it much easier, e.g. fd00::1 or fd00:2 (though this is bad practice, should be fdxy:zvwx:xyzw, xyvwz being rand…

  8. comment
    Comment #21807875

    So same trust you put in any 3rd party DNS service. But I agree there's less contractual bindings to this service than an account somewhere that you even might pay some money for i…

  9. comment
    Comment #21807770

    Their business seems to lie elsewhere. This appears to be a minor service they offer free of charge to the IPv6-interested community, maybe to promote IPv6 usage.

  10. comment
    Comment #21807730

    No, I am not affiliated with them (though we follow each other on Twitter). My point is, I don't see any security implication involved with a wrong PTR record in relation to this s…

  11. comment
    Comment #21806860

    But if they point to a new IP, the other IP's PTR is useless.

  12. comment
    Comment #21806828

    And then they have a certificate. What are they going to do with it? It's still not installed on your server.

  13. comment
    Comment #21805997

    How is that dangerous? If you don't "own" the IP, you can't add PTR for it.

  14. comment
    Comment #21805892

    Yes, you are missing something: S3 bucket resolves to Amazon's servers. .has-a.name resolves to the ip address specified in . You will have to install the certificate on the actual…

  15. comment
    Comment #21805856

    Same/similar working mechanism is built-in into Windows since Vista: 1234-5678--abcd.ipv6-literal.net This doesn't even need functioning DNS and can work offline (add s for link-lo…