Viewing profile — treysis
treysis
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 16, 2019, 6:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 25
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About treysis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26692458
Seems like all German accounts with 8-digit phone numbers are missing. Only 7-digit number accounts are shown.
-
comment
Comment #24059673
Some use it because it simplifies load balancing if you're thinking network-design in an IPv4-way.
-
comment
Comment #24059594
Yes. It offers better scalability! E.g. at my university, our institute has its own IPv4 /24. That means a maximum of ~253 or so devices. We have exhausted that number and for ever…
-
comment
Comment #24059527
He didn't say "all", he said "many". And that is factually right. Many ISPs use DSLite/CGNAT and don't hand out public IPv4 addresses to their customers anymore. Yes, some offer th…
-
comment
Comment #21813112
Yes, it seems like it is behind the times. It doesn't matter much at the moment, as there are no real IPv6-only services of relevance (unless you need to connect to the private IPv…
-
comment
Comment #21809342
But you don't need PTR in any of these steps.
-
comment
Comment #21809315
That just proves you haven't understood IPv6 yet. ULA addresses make it much easier, e.g. fd00::1 or fd00:2 (though this is bad practice, should be fdxy:zvwx:xyzw, xyvwz being rand…
-
comment
Comment #21807875
So same trust you put in any 3rd party DNS service. But I agree there's less contractual bindings to this service than an account somewhere that you even might pay some money for i…
-
comment
Comment #21807770
Their business seems to lie elsewhere. This appears to be a minor service they offer free of charge to the IPv6-interested community, maybe to promote IPv6 usage.
-
comment
Comment #21807730
No, I am not affiliated with them (though we follow each other on Twitter). My point is, I don't see any security implication involved with a wrong PTR record in relation to this s…
-
comment
Comment #21806860
But if they point to a new IP, the other IP's PTR is useless.
-
comment
Comment #21806828
And then they have a certificate. What are they going to do with it? It's still not installed on your server.
-
comment
Comment #21805997
How is that dangerous? If you don't "own" the IP, you can't add PTR for it.
-
comment
Comment #21805892
Yes, you are missing something: S3 bucket resolves to Amazon's servers. .has-a.name resolves to the ip address specified in . You will have to install the certificate on the actual…
-
comment
Comment #21805856
Same/similar working mechanism is built-in into Windows since Vista: 1234-5678--abcd.ipv6-literal.net This doesn't even need functioning DNS and can work offline (add s for link-lo…