Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — trevelyan

trevelyan

HN member
Joined
Sat, Feb 24, 2007, 3:48 AM UTC
HN karma
2,938
Public activity
1,423 items

About trevelyan

http://saito.tech

david - at - saito - dot - tech

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #40397308

    i use this regularly now. highly recommend over zoom.

  5. comment
    Comment #38797238

    The prompts shown literally invite the LLM to complete the copyrighted text by providing unedited selections and asking the machine to finish those. Even if this is problematic in …

  6. comment
    Comment #37972876

    Perhaps you are being a bit cynical? There are certainly no problems that can't be solved by giving more money to government initiatives like the MaRS Centre in Ontario. These inst…

  7. comment
    Comment #37761820

    You missed the last paragraph. The dominant strategy for users is indeed to broadcast two nodes.

  8. comment
    Comment #37749575

    the irony is that POW is actually more complex here, which is why it is vulnerable to these attacks

  9. comment
    Comment #37747951

    The sybil-proof mechanism here is not POS but a variant of POW.

  10. comment
    Comment #37747904

    I think perhaps you should read the paper if you want to have a deeper discussion? An understanding of how the mechanism works should make it clear how the solution enables outboun…

  11. comment
    Comment #37735638

    Do you want your transaction fee to pay for mining, or do you want it to pay for the servers that run the network? If it pays for mining, who pays for the servers that run the netw…

  12. comment
    Comment #37735618

    You seem to be concerned about censorship attacks -- attacks that necessarily involve orphaning work in some capacity -- either orphaning blocks produced by honest nodes, or orphan…

  13. comment
    Comment #37735507

    You're not describing a sybil attack. You're talking about censorship. If you want to address that, your best strategy is to incentivize people to run access points that do not cen…

  14. comment
    Comment #37735439

    > There are no excess hops in the attack I am describing. As above, you're not describing a sybil attack. Adding a bunch of 1st hop nodes to a network doesn't mean that those nodes…

  15. comment
    Comment #37735401

    > However depending on the architecture that is the only motivation needed and depriving others of rewards; in the long term this could result in centralization of routing nodes (b…

  16. comment
    Comment #37735309

    Author of the original paper this write-up was based on here. The sybil attack as a theoretical problem is defined in the "Red Balloons" paper ("information propagation without sel…

  17. comment
    Comment #37735283

    The attack vector you are describing doesn't work. If an attacker owns 1010 nodes and collects inbound transactions on 1010 nodes, then they have to relay those transactions to a s…

  18. comment
    Comment #37735240

    Saito isn't an obscure blockchain. The formal proof of its sybil-proof properties is also chain-agnostic. https://github.com/SaitoTech/papers/blob/main/sybil/A_Simple... It would b…

  19. comment
  20. story
  21. story
  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #33774610

    thank you for sharing this

  24. comment
    Comment #32862335

    Chiming in because we have an open source game engine on Saito ( https://saito.io/arcade ) which imo is the future of crypto gaming but is usually overlooked by people who want to …

  25. comment