Viewing profile — trentmc
trentmc
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 04, 2014, 1:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 238
- Public activity
- 83 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About trentmc
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15637728
Hi, thanks for the thoughts. For "why would I want to use this over a SQL alternative" see [2]. For "what kind of applications can I build with this?" see [1][2][3][4]. Cheers! [1]…
-
comment
Comment #15637702
As you'll see in my other comments (and articles on it), "blockchain" is better described as a field with a set of related goals for technology artifacts, rather than a specific da…
-
comment
Comment #15637679
"Truth" of course is a red herring. "Claim" is better. And, "digitally signed claim" is better yet. Then to answer your Q: a good sharding approach should let you see all digitally…
-
comment
Comment #15620029
Many people disagree about what blockchain technology is. To me, it' about the characteristics, rather than how they're implemented. I see three characteristics: decentralized, imm…
-
comment
Comment #15619937
To me, "blockchain-like" is about getting the benefits of decentralized, immutability (tamper-resistance), and assets. How one goes about getting those characteristics is wide open…
-
comment
Comment #15618882
> How does this solution respond to someone spinning up a thousand nodes, and simply voting for their double spend attack? This is the classic "Sybil attack". But I bet you knew th…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #15618779
You're welcome! :) Also, I encourage you to try out BigchainDB. Within just a few seconds you can send your first transaction to IPDB (BigchainDB public net): https://www.bigchaind…
-
comment
Comment #15618772
Thanks for responding to this query as well. Fully agreed:) BTW we work closely with the Ripple folks (especially on Interledger Protocol) and the iota folks (they're also in Berli…
-
comment
Comment #15618761
Thank you:) Even if there's hype and critique, we can always rise above and maintain our integrity as we build things that matter.
-
comment
Comment #15618751
+1 :)
-
comment
Comment #15618747
Hey Tony, great to hear from you! Yes please do check this out, we think it's interesting too:) Also interesting is BigchainDB's sister project www.oceanprotocol.com. Cheers!
-
comment
Comment #15618732
I should also mention that we've been working on supporting a BFT option. It should be out in the next release or two. https://github.com/bigchaindb/bigchaindb/blob/master/docs/ro.…
-
comment
Comment #15615483
Re (2): this would be a group of people or organizations running nodes together. (If it was just nodes you controlled it misses the point of being decentralized.) You could store s…
-
comment
Comment #15615411
Oh cool! Thanks for the ping, Dean. I hope you're well. Yeah blockchain space is a bit crazier than EDA, but some of us are engineers bringing our discipline and experience to this…
-
comment
Comment #15615379
Neither sharding nor encryption give "decentralized", "immutable", or "assets". E.g. how many sysadmins can MySQL have? (And the answer is 1. Hence, not decentralized.)
-
comment
Comment #15615333
I'm not defining "decentralized" as simply "distributed between multiple corporations, where multiple people have read/write access". To be "decentralized", it's key that there are…
-
comment
Comment #15615303
Good point! I think the Python folks made a great design choice there. I updated my comment above to help future readers.
-
comment
Comment #15615302
OK! :)
-
comment
Comment #15615299
Good point - BigchainDB wraps MongoDB, which is in C++. I updated my comment above to help future readers.
-
comment
Comment #15615288
Hi, it's Trent here, CTO of BigchainDB. That's a great question. It's surprising how few people are aware of the current German data protection laws (where we're based) and the upc…
-
comment
Comment #15615219
Hi, it's Trent here, the CTO of blockchain. > I know. I think if I read "scalable" and "blockchain" in the same sentence again I'll scream. I acknowledge the hype out there. FYI we…
-
comment
Comment #15615173
I totally acknowledge that there are pros and cons for both dynamically and statically typed languages. (We could start a 10 page discussion here. But I've been there before, perha…
-
comment
Comment #15615160
(Hi, it's Trent here, CTO of BigchainDB.) We can do a lot better than the scale of Bitcoin. And we are. Scale is part of the point. And you don't need to centralize to get scale. W…
-
comment
Comment #15615129
Hi, Trent here, CTO of BigchainDB. Correct, traditional blockchains like Bitcoin aren't scalable. The whole point of BigchainDB is to bring scale to (the database part) of the bloc…