Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — trash_panda

trash_panda

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 3:16 PM UTC
HN karma
79
Public activity
53 items

About trash_panda

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #18503221

    Not only do they not address the technical aspects of the paper, their response starts with a direct personal attack: "It seems Nadim (the author of this paper) took it really badl…

  2. comment
    Comment #18503090

    The analysis by Kobeissi is correct, and the claims by ProtonMail are a stretch, and sometimes they don't mean anything. For example, from their security details page [1]: "This me…

  3. comment
    Comment #18496534

    You can actually see what code your browser is running, you have view source and all the developer tools to analyze the JS code. This is their main defense, they will probably post…

  4. comment
    Comment #18488815

    I think what he means with certifications is that they'll get you the jobs you don't really want. For example, CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) is a certification you'll see in a lot…

  5. comment
    Comment #18488251

    Of course, you're welcome. I forgot to address the salary question. Six figure jobs are common in this industry, but experience is required to get those jobs. I don't personally kn…

  6. comment
    Comment #18488108

    First of all: what in particular do you find interesting of the security field? Are you more interesting in the offensive or defensive side? I guess that given your background, the…

  7. comment
    Comment #18468680

    This is really useful for security testing, where unexpected input could have security implications. There is a similar project, which I think is better organized and has more list…

  8. comment
    Comment #18407523

    Agree, but I also read this as a little condescending towards Chinese workers. We tend to attribute their success to corruption, exploitation, or brute-force (given their populatio…

  9. comment
    Comment #18336537

    There is no such thing as a "standard threat model". That's why the threat modeling concept exists in the first place, so you can adapt different solution to different requirements…

  10. comment
    Comment #18336475

    Privacy and security are intertwined. I believe Signal's decisions are based on the objective of making secure communications easy. If they catered to what some people want (no pho…

  11. comment
    Comment #18336312

    Google tracks you, yes. But Google also takes good measures to ensure that they are the only ones that can track you (and the Google Play apps of course). You may be obsessed with …

  12. comment
    Comment #18167743

    From their first blog post [1]: "We’re not placing any particular bounds on this project and will work to improve the security of any software depended upon by large numbers of peo…

  13. comment
    Comment #18121497

    Actually, you're both incorrect. It's "plata o plomo". "Plata" can mean "silver" or "money". In this context they are referring to "money". "Plato" is literally "plate" as in where…

  14. comment
    Comment #18114860

    It isn't a matter of whether it's "secure" or not. The problem is that their security model is based around JavaScript code being pushed to your browser where all the "cryptography…

  15. comment
    Comment #17861273

    Holy, I forgot about that one! You're totally right and I'm surprised it's not one of the main arguments for this push for HTTPS.

  16. comment
    Comment #17860933

    Of course, you're right. My phrasing was not the best. The rogue CA would need to perform a classical MiTM as all the other mortals do, having access to the signing keys does not g…

  17. comment
    Comment #17860884

    This is important. Because the discussion around HTTPS tends to train users into think that HTTPS = Web Security. I totally agree that it's important, and I understand the attack v…

  18. comment
    Comment #17860787

    You don't need to have private keys to exploit this scenario. Let's say you own example.com, and you add a certificate by Let's Encrypt. If Let's Encrypt is a malicious actor, they…

  19. comment
    Comment #17860680

    If it's an NSA honeypot it will still be a positive thing for 99% of use cases. Also, why would they do this? It's smarter to compromise the existing CAs.

  20. comment
    Comment #17859331

    I see what you mean. And this is the problems with this subject and why most of the times these discussions end up nowhere. We end up discussing on what this hypothetical "regular …

  21. comment
    Comment #17859087

    Of course, but I think that your portrayal of the regular user is not of a regular user at all. The regular users I know don't even know what syncing is, what the cloud is, what in…

  22. comment
    Comment #17858849

    Totally agree with your familiarity argument. I think that's the main reason why Linux can't compete. One can think that the desktop OS for a regular user is a commodity, so why re…

  23. comment
    Comment #17858825

    I think that your view on the needs of the regular user is pretty agreeable. I don't get why you got these kind of replies. Nothing you said was controversial about the regular use…

  24. comment
    Comment #17633366

    A quick line count shows that the file from your link has 14354 entries, while the one on the github repo has 65357.

  25. comment
    Comment #17633306

    A good solution I've found for ad blocking is using the following hosts file: https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts Which sinkholes every known ad/malicious domain. It's been pretty…