Viewing profile — trapnii
trapnii
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 27, 2013, 12:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 33 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About trapnii
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37829285
> What’s modal about it? Modal? The various input modes. Think of them as if you're using vi/vim, except that it's a terminal. Insert mode is just like every other terminal. Press …
-
comment
Comment #37829223
This is interesting. I am trying not to feel offended by your toxic play, so let's get started: > kitty's graphics protocol is literally infinitely faster than sixels for local tra…
-
comment
Comment #37829114
This doesn't make sense. WebGL is as GPU accelerated as the other young'ish GPU accelerated terminals, except that they're not running in the browser, which should(tm) make them ru…
-
comment
Comment #37829100
We finally have a software-fallback, and do not hard-depend on AES-NI anymore. But if it's present, we'll use it (also its equivalent on ARM64)
-
comment
Comment #37829089
Hey, we are using Qt only on the pure frontend GUI side. The rendering itself is using FreeType + HarfBuzz independantly of the GUI. We chose this model explicitly to still be free…
-
comment
Comment #37829055
To be honest, refterm was a bad idea to begin with. It's not a terminal, and it eventually also stated that in its README.md. Not to mention, that you - by definition - can't compa…
-
comment
Comment #37825615
simply put, yes. but I know very well that performance can be measured in many different dimensions and ways. I optimize for speed for my own personal use-cases (vim should be flue…
-
comment
Comment #37821542
There are even YT videos about that. Not kittyng :)
-
comment
Comment #37821316
How did you install Contour and what is the TERM environment variable set to and is your terminfo properly resolved? I just asked someone with an AMD/NVIDIA card to try out nvtop i…
-
comment
Comment #37821301
> In comparaison I have to add that the rendering in more defined in Urxvt that Contour even after tinkering, Nothing is perfect. Many thanks for trying though. If you don't mind, …
-
comment
Comment #37821196
While I personally find your comment quite insulting, I think that we have pretty brought support for various mainstream Linux distributions and also release binaries, including fo…
-
comment
Comment #37821117
> It would be nice if someone worked on actually improving the terminal experience. Contour. Oh, sorry, I mean: To be honest? There are plenty of young terminals that work on that,…
-
comment
Comment #37820992
There are many reasons for me to not have kitty protocol implemented. Objectively speaking, I try to mention only one here: Sixel seems to have raised attraction across the whole t…
-
comment
Comment #37820956
Please give us feedback in the issue tracker. We know we're not perfect, but certainly very much appreciate positive constructive feedback as well as bug reports. p.s.: I did not s…
-
comment
Comment #37820929
To be fair, the vi input mode (or modal input modes) in Contour are way more than simply doing `set -o vi` in bash. You cannot compare those two. The reason why I implemented modal…
-
comment
Comment #32183082
Monomux is a terminal multiplexer that isn't a terminal emulator. Less featureful than tmux (therefore) but still the better screen. Read the "Why" section for a much better explan…
- story
-
comment
Comment #31360707
Exactly. Therefore you cannot compare a renderers performance with some other that has a fully functional VT backend attached. The comparising result is meaningless. His renderer i…
-
comment
Comment #31293272
> > I am open for being corrected > No. No you're not. Because you keep shifting goalposts and ignoring inconvenient truths. I still am. Please submit a PR to refterm to that imple…
-
comment
Comment #31290433
[flagged]
- comment
-
comment
Comment #31290112
I don't your name, pc86, is a real name, too. That's the life of them internet. So much about Pseudonym. So if already the very first statement is that questionable, how can I beli…
-
comment
Comment #31289088
> And yes it is simple. I like. Please submit a PR and make Windows Terminal as fast as refterm, trivially speaking, 2GB/s, no slower than the unoptimized refterm. Just to quote yo…
-
comment
Comment #31288829
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #31287695
Reading your post feels good, man. But your last sentence kind of bothers me. Why do you feel they are insulting you now? I think, if at all, someone else was, and kept doing, and …