Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — transitionality

transitionality

HN member
Joined
Fri, Dec 21, 2012, 5:14 AM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
177 items

About transitionality

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #7514289

    That is so odd. You would think that an email sent at 6 am would get more people than one sent at 8:30 am, because it gets the news-at-the-desk people and the early-riser, news-dur…

  3. comment
    Comment #7494978

    SJWs are a tiny, insane minority. You neither represent, nor speak for the community. You certainly do not speak for me.

  4. comment
    Comment #7494964

    Needs more Bittorrent.

  5. comment
    Comment #7491943

    2048 isn't a clone, it's a snowclone.

  6. comment
    Comment #7491819

    And Threes is free riding on the work done to design the classical number sliding puzzle, Objective C, the iPhone, and tons of other inventions. We all build upon others' work. As …

  7. comment
    Comment #7486041

    > how do we know that LGBT people at Mozilla are getting fair treatment? He's explicitly stated that he's committed to fair and equitable treatment of all employees. That's how you…

  8. comment
    Comment #7479224

    Trying to get someone fired because you disagree with their political stance is both intolerant and bigoted. It is political oppression.

  9. comment
    Comment #7479216

    Actually, the Founding Fathers were pretty big on anonymous free speech. Remember the Federalist Papers.

  10. comment
    Comment #7474821

    Not a significant threat. I think the developer community can easily weather the loss of a couple of percent of its ranks.

  11. comment
    Comment #7474813

    The former does not follow from the latter.

  12. comment
    Comment #7468885

    Every stance affects someone's life or other, in some way or other. You're trying to get this man fired. That affects his life in a very negative way. You don't seem to care much a…

  13. comment
    Comment #7464854

    It would still be illegal to fire someone over their political affiliation, even one that invokes Godwin's Law and automagically loses the parent the argument anyway.

  14. comment
    Comment #7464849

    That is not true for the vast majority of people. The vast majority of people are not flip-floppers.

  15. comment
    Comment #7462269

    That is not the Nazi Party though, is it?

  16. comment
    Comment #7462251

    If a Republican wanted to work for a Democrat, and if he were denied employment for that reason alone, that would be illegal, yes.

  17. comment
    Comment #7462245

    Unless you can demonstrate that they acted in a hostile manner towards anyone, you can't fire someone over opinions or speech, no.

  18. comment
    Comment #7462227

    No, not always. I already gave the Ives counterexample re: the influence criterion. As for the pay criterion, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-dollar_salary

  19. comment
    Comment #7462212

    Why are you even wasting electrons typing this stuff? Unless you have a supporting argument or counterargument, you have no valid contribution.

  20. comment
    Comment #7462201

    Getting a sex change operation is a matter of choice, too.

  21. comment
    Comment #7462071

    There's absolutely no basis for defaming Brendan Eich like that.

  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #7462045

    Not much of a counterargument there.

  24. comment
    Comment #7462000

    Everybody has justifications for their bigotry. Talk to a KKK wizard sometime. I'm sure he has a compelling backstory, too. Doesn't change the fact that it's still bigotry.

  25. comment
    Comment #7461992

    They're discriminating against him on the basis of his political stance, trying to start up a witch hunt or mob against him, and trying to disenfranchise him of his employment. The…