Viewing profile — transitionality
transitionality
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 21, 2012, 5:14 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 78
- Public activity
- 177 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About transitionality
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7514289
That is so odd. You would think that an email sent at 6 am would get more people than one sent at 8:30 am, because it gets the news-at-the-desk people and the early-riser, news-dur…
-
comment
Comment #7494978
SJWs are a tiny, insane minority. You neither represent, nor speak for the community. You certainly do not speak for me.
-
comment
Comment #7494964
Needs more Bittorrent.
-
comment
Comment #7491943
2048 isn't a clone, it's a snowclone.
-
comment
Comment #7491819
And Threes is free riding on the work done to design the classical number sliding puzzle, Objective C, the iPhone, and tons of other inventions. We all build upon others' work. As …
-
comment
Comment #7486041
> how do we know that LGBT people at Mozilla are getting fair treatment? He's explicitly stated that he's committed to fair and equitable treatment of all employees. That's how you…
-
comment
Comment #7479224
Trying to get someone fired because you disagree with their political stance is both intolerant and bigoted. It is political oppression.
-
comment
Comment #7479216
Actually, the Founding Fathers were pretty big on anonymous free speech. Remember the Federalist Papers.
-
comment
Comment #7474821
Not a significant threat. I think the developer community can easily weather the loss of a couple of percent of its ranks.
-
comment
Comment #7474813
The former does not follow from the latter.
-
comment
Comment #7468885
Every stance affects someone's life or other, in some way or other. You're trying to get this man fired. That affects his life in a very negative way. You don't seem to care much a…
-
comment
Comment #7464854
It would still be illegal to fire someone over their political affiliation, even one that invokes Godwin's Law and automagically loses the parent the argument anyway.
-
comment
Comment #7464849
That is not true for the vast majority of people. The vast majority of people are not flip-floppers.
-
comment
Comment #7462269
That is not the Nazi Party though, is it?
-
comment
Comment #7462251
If a Republican wanted to work for a Democrat, and if he were denied employment for that reason alone, that would be illegal, yes.
-
comment
Comment #7462245
Unless you can demonstrate that they acted in a hostile manner towards anyone, you can't fire someone over opinions or speech, no.
-
comment
Comment #7462227
No, not always. I already gave the Ives counterexample re: the influence criterion. As for the pay criterion, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-dollar_salary
-
comment
Comment #7462212
Why are you even wasting electrons typing this stuff? Unless you have a supporting argument or counterargument, you have no valid contribution.
-
comment
Comment #7462201
Getting a sex change operation is a matter of choice, too.
-
comment
Comment #7462071
There's absolutely no basis for defaming Brendan Eich like that.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7462045
Not much of a counterargument there.
-
comment
Comment #7462000
Everybody has justifications for their bigotry. Talk to a KKK wizard sometime. I'm sure he has a compelling backstory, too. Doesn't change the fact that it's still bigotry.
-
comment
Comment #7461992
They're discriminating against him on the basis of his political stance, trying to start up a witch hunt or mob against him, and trying to disenfranchise him of his employment. The…