Viewing profile — transfire
transfire
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 28, 2012, 9:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,145
- Public activity
- 1,516 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About transfire
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48166206
Sad. A great idea ruined by poor business practices.
-
comment
Comment #48166182
The GOAT.
-
comment
Comment #47436080
I am a little confused. Is this still JSON? Is it “binary“ JSON?
-
comment
Comment #46888922
Holy Deep Dive, Batman. This has to be the most mathematically heavy design for creating TUIs ever conceived. The name makes sense. But does it blend ? (Actually useable?)
-
comment
Comment #46787874
CLI is an API, so I decided to treat it as such and created Jargon (for Crystal). Define CLI in JSON Schema, get argument parsing, validation, help text, and shell completions for …
- story
-
comment
Comment #46381234
Honestly if it were not for my extensive Ruby background that I have now been able to carry over to Crystal, I probably would have dived into Guile. (I have been enjoying Elixir to…
-
comment
Comment #45575340
FOR loops? YAML has a merge key The merge key is a clever little trick, but it depends of the special hash key, so lists can’t be merged. Syntax does matter, which is why YAML matt…
-
comment
Comment #45230904
So brilliant that we’re all still using ASCII!† † With an occasional UNICODE flourish.
-
comment
Comment #45099010
I agree. Separate keys would be better. I wonder if hat word processors would have used a separate Enter (or Go!) for?
-
comment
Comment #45020869
I hope there are no major problems to commercialization. This will be huge!
-
comment
Comment #44205616
IDK. They all look a little atrocious to me. But readability has a lot to do with what you are used to. The only exception might be FORTH. A very well written FORTH implementation …
-
comment
Comment #44112574
That’s awesome! Now have it mark blocks of text on or off, so it can ignore irrelevant, or worse erroneous material — no need to include it in the context window.
-
comment
Comment #43969957
Do we really need a new “code container” type for this? Could modules not serve the purpose by localizing require. e.g. module Foo require “bar” … end So everything bar.rb loads in…
-
comment
Comment #43951822
It was almost exactly the same expect in VB you had use some esoteric code to access databases — and they kept changing what was the “proper” way to do it. (I think by the time I q…
-
comment
Comment #43769316
Is this a reflection of the economy in general or just Intel’s own troubles? With Apple’s move to Arm and increasing interest in RISCV, the x86 architecture hegemony seems to final…
-
comment
Comment #43756868
As long as Let’s Encrypt is still around. I find it hard to believe there is no way to secure without requiring an authority in the middle.
-
comment
Comment #43710889
Who cares? What does a certificate tell me other than someone paid for a certificate. And what do certificate buyers gain? The ability for their site to be revoked or expired and t…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43673258
GoboLinux has you all beat.
-
comment
Comment #43672348
Absolutely correct! Please correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know, no one has implemented YAML completely according to spec. The tag schema used is supposed to be modifiabl…
-
comment
Comment #43564720
Just go open source already. Good grief Hyperion has no idea how to actually make money.
-
comment
Comment #43298156
Between this and other changes I worry they are just throwing more and more stuff at the wall to widen their browser moat. Is command and commandfor actually a good idea? I underst…
-
comment
Comment #43209883
If you haven’t refactored most of your code more than once, you are doing it wrong.
-
comment
Comment #42981180
Trained only on a thousand curated questions? Something doesn’t add up… Oh… they just fined turned an already existing model.