Viewing profile — tomnipotent
tomnipotent
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 11, 2014, 6:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,318
- Public activity
- 2,283 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tomnipotent
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49189713
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49186943
> I don't see a fit for APIs here Baically protobuf, Cap’n Proto, msgpack, Avro, or every other serialization approach that versions schemas?
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49124949
> on tiny writes Postgres doesn't do "tiny writes" - it writes whole pages multiple times on every update even if you're only changing 4 bytes, combined with even more writes later…
-
comment
Comment #49116395
You can't tune your way out of this constraint. The heap table and MVCC implementation put a hard ceiling on what can be accomplished without reaching for another tool.
-
comment
Comment #49116311
> scales a very long way This ignores the fine print. It scales a very long way under specific circumstances with specific workloads. The more write-heavy your workload the less el…
-
comment
Comment #49116097
That post is about how Postgres doesn't scale for write-heavy workloads and that they had to move those workloads to Cosmos DB. For the rest of the remaining mostly-read workload t…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49079321
Did you miss that a company attorney acknowledged "the ketamine therapy issue has factored into the termination?"
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48894975
> and I believe it was premeditated So in other words you're just vibing conspiracy theories and will believe whatever makes you feel better. The only example of thin skin I see is…
-
comment
Comment #48894855
There's literally nothing in that post of substance, other than the fact the Zig community is obsessed with trying to "prove him wrong" or some other such nonsense. Jarred's respon…
-
comment
Comment #48894713
> perpetually offended snowflakes This attitude is so precious to me - "Sorry guys, you can't criticize my criticism." > What Bun did here is basically a sabotage of Zig's reputati…
-
comment
Comment #48894699
It this a joke? Your example of Jarred starting fights in public is announcing fork then pointing to a thread where he didn't even participate but rather where members of the Zig c…
-
comment
Comment #48867214
> have public fights with the language maintainers Can you point to even one such example?
-
comment
Comment #48851284
Andrew decided to attack the person rather than ideas and positions. It's not a reflexive revulsion, it's an appropriately sized reaction to a blog post in poor taste. > not having…
-
comment
Comment #48848716
What points? All I'm reading is just a collection of emotional ad-hominems.
-
comment
Comment #48837947
No they haven't. It's been said time and time again that their teams were struggling with large JS code bases for Bing Maps and O365 web apps.
-
comment
Comment #48837767
> You really should just not assume things And yet you follow this up by making assumptions about the motivations behind TS. Anders has mentioned that TS was purely motivated by in…
-
comment
Comment #48821019
You seem to lack a basic understanding of what a market is in the context of a monopoly, and you can't argue your way around a bad foundation. > our argument is basically "the law …
-
comment
Comment #48820090
Of course not, but most folks poking at Microsoft are just borrowing their opinion from other people and regurgitating it for karma. I'm happy to crap on MS for bad decisions, but …
-
comment
Comment #48777631
The Supreme Court ruled once on what they consider an aftermarket monopoly against Kodak in the 1990s, but the aftermarket angle on monopolies has been basically abandoned from a l…
-
comment
Comment #48777499
> they now have total command of supply They've always had control by licensing who can publish games on their platform. Now that contract with publishers has changed who can distr…
-
comment
Comment #48769000
None of your examples pass any of the checks for a monopoly unless you twist the definition of "market" to be the narrowest possible. Situational exclusivity is not the same as a m…