Viewing profile — tomkwong
tomkwong
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jan 07, 2018, 6:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 143
- Public activity
- 58 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tomkwong
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44233597
I had done something slightly different. I would ask LLM to prepare a design doc, not code, and iterate on that doc before I ask them to start coding. That seems to have worked a l…
-
comment
Comment #34755765
I have learned to not worry about coding style anymore, not because I don’t care, but because too many people care about that. Having worked with one of the largest monorepo, I’m h…
-
comment
Comment #31663977
> you just have to keep in your head all the methods that are expected to exist for a given type. Technically, you don't need to keep that in your head :-) The general approach is …
-
comment
Comment #31565913
There’s no privacy agreement to sign when setting up the fridge? I had to click on the Agree button several times when I started with my LG TV!
-
comment
Comment #31527054
100% click bait title and opening statement. Is journalism that bad these days? Ironically I quite like some of the points in the main content.
-
comment
Comment #31273759
First, I want to say that this is a great post. You always grow stronger when you make mistakes. Writing it up solidify understanding in the learning process. This story resonates …
- story
-
comment
Comment #27419007
I agree for the most part. However, IMHO using these words (just, simply, etc) occasionally can make the doc more lively and fun to read.
-
comment
Comment #24855173
I started walking for at least 30 minutes every morning before work, and it has become a habit during this pandemic. I realized that the best ideas of solving problems came from th…
-
comment
Comment #24743578
Storing larger data sets in CSV format is a recipe for disaster. As tech industry we should really come together With a standard binary format for data exchange. Maybe Arrow?
-
comment
Comment #24339857
Building queries in a programming language is more flexible and the data operation is explicit. You rely on good programmers to do it right. By contrast, SQL is more constrained ab…
-
comment
Comment #24339810
Congrats! Thanks for sharing. I think one of the best decisions you made was the choice of the domain name. It feels authentic.
- story
-
comment
Comment #24044274
This statement is so wrong. I am using Julia for at least two mission-critical production systems by now (financial services industry). I have a complete dev ops workflow plus inte…
-
comment
Comment #23797097
I love SQS but it isn't quite comparable to Kafka because it is poll-based. It's a solid queue but not suitable for streaming.
-
comment
Comment #23797019
How is Kinesis crappy?
-
comment
Comment #23743229
The power of multiple dispatch is an eye opener for me personally when I first learned about Julia. It's hard to get back to OOP once you're used to multiple dispatch. It's so natu…
- story
-
comment
Comment #23484893
This discourse post seems useful https://discourse.julialang.org/t/writing-a-parser-in-julia/... Not sure about what kind of parser you're thinking about. If you like to do it in J…
-
comment
Comment #23484833
I have a working situation where I need to work with Python and Julia. I'd like to say that there are great interoperability between these runtimes, so you can easily call a Python…
- story
-
comment
Comment #23439986
It’s more than that though. Once the list is sorted, the next time you come back to it, the list is still more or less in the right priority. So the work for prioritization becomes…
-
comment
Comment #23367528
> It’s also rather annoying to type them, but that’s also probably because I just haven’t developed a workflow for it. That's true. I remember hitting C-c and C-v a lot... XD
-
comment
Comment #23367279
I don't know if there's any name about this specific refactoring change :-) In general, it is best to create small functions that takes few dependent variables for the intended fle…
-
comment
Comment #23367239
>You've just introduced an exponential explosion into your testing burden. The pay-off: additional functionality that might be useful later. > edit On reflection I suppose it's not…