Viewing profile — tomhoad

Recently, there seems to be this ever-growing, romantic vision of turning the clock back to a time when the browser was simpler. Certainly, in terms of accessibility, the JavaScrip…

> yet users who want or need to disable JS are often left out in the cold. Isn't that just a preference of the user, that has repercussions? In fact the WCAG 2.0 specifically says …

Using JS ternaries for conditional rendering doesn't feel natural to me at all

Github is not Git. There are no Github 'commands'.

https://popmotion.io/pose/learn/animating-children/#animatin...

> explicitly checked for as part of a QA process After you've written the application? That makes absolutely no sense, unless you enjoy renaming lots of elements. > instead of rely…

According to WCAG 2.0, yes I am.

You deserve downvotes. Semantic HTML is a key part of making your website accessible for people with disabilities. Ignore it, and you shouldn't be making things for the web.

> I find zero value in using ul/li's for lists that aren't bulleted Browsers don't care. You may not care either. But people with disabilities attempting to make sense of your webs…

Pretty much because of staggering

Easier to whine on HackerNews.

I _think_ that's ironic

This looks promising, animations in React are a bit of a mess right now. React-motion requires a PhD to figure out, and I'd rather stick pins in my eyes than use Transition Group. …

Maybe English isn't their first language?

No PaaS provider costs their DB instances on number of selects... Perhaps you're the Junior developer?!

This website looks like it was made in 2000.

What am I looking at? I've pressed pretty much everything and nothing happens.