Viewing profile — tomberek
tomberek
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 21, 2013, 1:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 336
- Public activity
- 142 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tomberek
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49218568
The Nixpkgs Core team was established in Sept 2025 ( https://discourse.nixos.org/t/establishing-the-nixpkgs-core-... ), so it is a fairly new concept and idea. They've accomplished…
-
comment
Comment #48618264
Perhaps give boats some advantage in capacity.
-
comment
Comment #45774540
Presumably this would support a big improvement to both SBOM generation as well as various UX features and workflow improvements.
-
comment
Comment #44630237
Trading perfect reproducibility for usability: a pragmatic look at Flox's new features
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #42302141
This is exactly how I can rapidly prototype things. Once proficient with this tooling is becomes very easy to quickly spin up services and PoCs. Managing it and iterating is also a…
-
comment
Comment #42260817
Random thought. Another commenter worried about the runtime of the program becoming mangled and performing destructive operations on your machine. What if you run the reducer as a …
-
comment
Comment #41936952
Agreed. Packaging is different than deployment. Devs should return to the art of packaging, such that their software can be then deployed into containers, VMs, micro VMs, whatever.…
- story
-
comment
Comment #41751979
This is excellent. Have you considered making a presentation or a write-up of the experience?
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #41203651
A similar article for bringing Ruby into the Nix ecosystem: https://flox.dev/blog/flox-and-ruby
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #40803663
This is an excellent pattern. Nix uses it to allow one to create a full transitive build graph, serialized that plan, move it around, and execute it in a distributed and reproducib…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #39700107
`flox` needs Nix to function. So the rpm/dev/OSX installers first install Nix, and then installs flox itself. If you have Nix already, you can try it out as described here: https:/…
-
comment
Comment #39697896
That link in hub.flox.dev is wrong. The link at https://flox.dev/terms-conditions is correct. Fixing.... thanks!
-
comment
Comment #39697466
The python ecosystem will require specific support, so at the moment we recommend using `flox` to get all of the other things that might not be managed by an existing Python packag…
-
comment
Comment #39697413
Yes. We have designs to allow for more powerful configuration for experts. A good example of this is let people use alternative manifest representations; JSON, Nix, etc.
-
comment
Comment #39695594
Yes, I'm also a Nix maintainer. `nix develop` does many other things, originally based on re-creating the build environment of a derivation. This means that it is not ideal for the…
-
comment
Comment #39695415
Yes. For limited situations it provides a simpler interface. Flox won't provide exactly the same feature set, but there are many situations where home-manager is too much. You can …