Viewing profile — tomasz-tomczyk

I like the look of it - my main problem with remote control feature in CC is the inability to start a new terminal session on my computer - can I do that from Pulse?

Yeah I have a soft spot for Cursor because it was my first tool that unlocked huge productivity with AI, but I avoid doing anything there now. Should try their CLI!

Same experience here - I built a similar tool, for reviewing both plans and code - https://crit.md (shameless plug), browser based as opposed to TUI. Having said that, I don't revi…

It's been three months now of building Crit - https://crit.md - local first, open source tool for reviewing markdown and code output from your favourite AI agent. It's inspired by …

That is very close to what I was looking to whip up with CC myself, so thanks! What is your read on the ToS? From what I understood, Anthropic want anything automation-wise be on t…

When building new features, I use a skill that generates 5+ variants based on various companies' design language and patterns, in plain html/css/js - quick throwaway prototypes, gi…

On a personal note, as this is my first proper OSS project, I'm very humbled by the response and the feedback from the users! And it made me realise I need to be reaching out to ma…

Crit is a single-binary CLI that opens your file or code diffs in a browser with GitHub-inspired interface. Your favourite agent acts on the feedback and responds back - continue u…

Thanks! What extension were you using?

https://crit.md - a CLI tool for reviewing AI coding agent output like a GitHub PR. I got frustrated with Claude Code and Cursor producing plausible-but-wrong changes with no easy …

https://crit.md - a CLI tool for reviewing AI coding agent output like a GitHub PR. I got frustrated with Claude Code and Cursor producing plausible-but-wrong changes with no easy …

https://crit.md - a CLI tool for reviewing AI coding agent output like a GitHub PR. I got frustrated with Claude Code and Cursor producing plausible-but-wrong changes with no easy …

I've been doing a lot of parallel work and it can be draining. It feels exciting to have 6 agents spinning on things, but unless you have very well scoped plans, you need to still …

I'd love for all these tools to standardise on the structure of plugins / skills / commands / hooks etc., so I can swap between them to compare without feeling handicapped!

Well, it's one conversation per bot. I set it up, connected the channel. DM'd it (only way to converse with it - wish I could have a Discord channel per project, different CWDs etc…

I like it but it's one conversation at a time, no ability to manually compact the chat... I guess it's an early version still.

Just when I increased my subscription with CC for more Opus 4.6 usage :)

I'm using obra superpowers plugin in CC and the plans it produces are very code-heavy, which is great for reviewing - I catch issues early. It's quite verbose however and if your c…

Yes, reviewing things make things slower. Not reviewing them produces horrible results. There's a balance to be found and it depends on the team/org. I hope we shift engineers clos…

Not sure this works very well. I got 10/21 with 3 quick wins: - Start recording major architecture and workflow decisions in ADRs. I'm not sure all decisions need to be in ADRs. I …

It's likely going to be a game of whack-a-mole, especially with AI as opposed to simple bots/scripts. Not that they shouldn't try to prevent it, but not entirely sure what the solu…

Reviewing agent output in a terminal is painful. When Claude generates a 1000-line markdown plan, you can't easily say "change this specific bullet" without copying the text, switc…

Late to the thread but I've been excited to be building crit to help reviewing plans & output from LLM agents - it has boosted my productivity a lot personally and I had a lot of n…

Beautiful apps! Well done I like the idea of Kvile, I hate Postman with passion -- but I'm having difficulty getting started - I expected a screen to start creating a network reque…