Viewing profile — tobyhinloopen
tobyhinloopen
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Aug 29, 2014, 10:45 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,952
- Public activity
- 1,171 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tobyhinloopen
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48829681
Don't developers configure their LLM tools to only be able to access things the user using the LLM should have access to?
-
comment
Comment #48599575
Gotta love the LP4 mode. So much music on a single disk! Remember the cool rectangular batteries? Why aren't these gumstick batteries more used in modern devices!?
-
comment
Comment #48596819
I'll 100% try DuckDB in more serious projects where I would normally use Sqlite.
-
comment
Comment #48596200
The only reason I know and use DuckDB is because my (internal, private-use-only, experimental) vibe coded projects use it a ton. I didn't pick it - LLMs did. Until this article, I …
-
comment
Comment #48566298
Try the superpowers plugin, let it write a spec (what do you want?) and a plan (how is it implemented). Then let it implement the plan. Review each step as much as you care. These …
-
comment
Comment #48566142
You know what’s worse (less efficient) at parsing and writing code than LLMs? Humans.
-
comment
Comment #48551148
“This is a significant rewrite that will take weeks” Done after my potty break
-
comment
Comment #48544641
Try it on RAM and CPU. It’s slower but you can run them.
-
comment
Comment #48538858
That’s a great idea. Maybe use Claude Code with some owasp knowledge to sweep through them and see if there’s anything obvious?
-
comment
Comment #48538293
Because the air is squished out I suppose
-
comment
Comment #48517520
Min Release Age of 7-30 days covers the majority of potential issues with 0 effort. All major Node package managers should support it by now. Prom was the best IIRC, yarn second, b…
-
comment
Comment #48513620
I agree with this, It feels like a small upgrade like Opus 4.9 or something. It’s still pretty good though
-
comment
Comment #48513598
I’ve been doing pentesting with LLMs for a while and only hit a few “nope I won’t do that” and one “this conversation is flagged for being against the TOS”. No idea what the guardr…
-
comment
Comment #48508702
Claude “respond in a friendly way that I agree with this comment”
-
comment
Comment #48500435
I actively support “my boss” to run Claude Code. I offered them to help and made jokes it’s so easy these days they might as well just call Claude Code themselves. I’ve shown I cou…
-
comment
Comment #48500382
I told something like “your value lies in reviewing the output yourself before sharing it, not in calling Claude. I can also use Claude.”
-
comment
Comment #48486900
You can order LLMs to use other patterns. I had an LLM recreate an app in a different stack with reasonable success
-
comment
Comment #48486408
You mean these tools you can now rebuild at the cost of a night and one Claude code subscription? You have to have an ordinarily unique startup if your software can’t be recreated …
-
comment
Comment #48473797
That’s a bold claim to randomly write without any supporting sources
-
comment
Comment #48452251
Just as long as you speak a major language
-
comment
Comment #48438670
(A) I spent day and night using and making tools with and for LLMs. (B) As much as I humanly can.
-
comment
Comment #48434393
I think this is the first time I saw someone describe so clearly my concerns and experience with LLMs. I have little to add to it, except that I agree completely. Not sure what’s n…
-
comment
Comment #48428766
I expected a “running for beginners” app hah, like for training / endurance
-
comment
Comment #48424898
Not sure yet. I’m monitoring it. However, it is totally viable for internal tools, rapid prototyping, experiments, etc. Frankly, there’s no faster or cheaper way to get such featur…
-
comment
Comment #48421759
It’s interesting though because the client’s dev team basically refused to look at it, dismissing it as insecure and such. I realized that the software he had made was actually bet…