Viewing profile — thunky

You're accusing GP of saying something they didn't say and simultaneously telling them they don't "get it". That's distasteful.

Great. Just don't get upset when a politician you don't like wipes his butt with the consititution.

The article is fine. LLMs are just turning everyone into divas.

Did you read TFA? Because all of your questions are answered clearly there.

The good news: Your worst complaint has nothing to do with the overall content or accuracy of the post. Just style bashing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

A Million Little Pieces was a popular book about addiction that inspired a lot of people. Turned out the story wasn't true, and so a lot of inspiration turned into anger. Always th…

All of the gripes OP has with Django are arguably worse in Rails.

This implies that "create" is the hard part that we should not offload to machines. But IME all of the other things are the hard part. So basically it's fine to get the LLM to thin…

With respect, you're likely being taken advantage of. Your advisor doesn't have any fancy computer with more info than you have. You're paying for an illusion and it's not cheap: A…

[flagged]

> This is the misunderstanding. Golfnow is for advertising. Yes that is the misunderstanding. Lets agree to disagree.

> With respect, I don’t think you understand what you’re talking about. Probably not. I'm just telling you my observation. And you're pointing out a problem without offering a solu…

Obviously it is, because Golfnow is certainly not a monopoly. There are small golf courses near me that don't use them and that's fine. Please don't shame the ones that do.

> Because it's convenient to have all buyers operating through a single network I just don't see Golfnow as a "single network". I golf with a lot of people that have never heard of…

> Golf Now can be incredibly bad for those courses Golfnow offers a service that courses must value, otherwise why would they list with them? And golfers get good deals. It's not c…

I agree, which is why I prefer to say software developer rather than engineer .

Sure but lets not pretend this is engineering.

> I think the tool itself might be at fault. I don't think so. I don't think it's about being "unworthy to work with" (your quote not mine). I think the uncomfortable truth is that…

Your examples indicate that you're working with unproductive people. The truth may just be that you're wasting time and energy engaging with a non-productive coworker's poor output…

Atlassian could have fired her for no reason and had no problem.

I think you're helping GPs point: there is a lot of efficiency gains to be made to match the processing power of the brain, given it's size and power draw.

Its not fair that US has to bench their leading scorer due to a mistake either. So there's no way to please both sides. But beating someone with one hand tied behind their back sho…

I never said anything about code reuse, taking credit, or approval. So I'm not sure what your points are related to.

> Would you be so sure of this opinion if the requirement was to write "a simple CRUD app", but it had to integrate with a poorly documented legacy system and was for a big client …