Viewing profile — thrwaway1234567

>(b) No person may knowingly and intentionally disclose, cause to be disclosed or threaten to disclose, with the intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, humiliate, embarrass, or co…

It's like I explained above. It's safe to assume they don't care that much about free speech, because Null has banned people for dissent. An example: https://ghostarchive.org/archi…

>He doesn't allow doxxing out of a commitment to free speech. To rephrase that sentence: Free speech isn't the reason he allows doxing on the forum.

He also hasn't lost any cases yet. Other than Melinda Scott, all the other lawsuits against him are ongoing.

Service providers have already been policing websites. It didn't start with kiwifarms. If you go on twitter and look at the profiles of registrars like namecheap, you'll often see …

>imo some sort of safe harbor mechanism is a reasonable compromise. we can't expect the host to prevent every single instance of abusive content, but we should require them to make…

> Well for starters that Kiwifarms killed Byuu. There is no evidence that it was bullying or harassment from kiwi farms that caused his him to commit suicide. Byuu/Near is the one …

If he just wanted kiwifarms to be a gossip forum he could have banned doxxing. He doesn't allow doxxing out of a commitment to free speech. The forum doesn't actually have that muc…

>In other words, an open internet. Doxxing is not illegal if your intent is not considered harassment or threatening (if it's just for "public shame" or ridicule, that's allowed). …

I don't think he'd qualify for the good faith moderation mentioned in section 230. He's only won cases against Melinda Scott.

What unfounded allegations about the site have been allowed?

Some of the examples are rather recent, and there's no evidence of the site's behavior changing. The point is that the site has allowed harassment, contrary to what the owner claim…

That page I linked lists all of the laws in the usa about revenge porn. Kiwifarms isn't based in nevada as far as I am aware, I believe it's west virginia or florida.

It's archived links to things the owner of the site has said. Instead of complaining about keffals, why don't you address the complains there.

>Revenge porn isn't generally illegal to post. Posting pornography as revenge is the illegal bit, generally speaking. IIRC, there are laws against sharing revenge porn in 48 states…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/03/kiwifar... Her Social security number was posted on KF, and this is something that came up in her leaked complaint emails.

I assume part of the confusion that people have is that kiwifarms harassment is not (always) blatantly obvious. Most of the time, they don't outright say "go harass this person" (u…

Plenty of that stuff is more recent. >He's fine with stolen credit card and social security numbers being posted to the forum: https://archive.fo/rOKai That is from last year. But …

In your article you state that kiwifarms has rules against harassment: >If I ask Google Gemini to describe the Kiwi Farms in a sentence, it tells me “a controversial web forum know…

Some news articles about kiwifarms might get a few minor details wrong. I've seen one mix up the timeline of the site's founding. But they describe the site's content accurately. T…

There are things on the website aren't legal speech or are at least legally questionable. Harassment is illegal for one. The owner is fine with revenge porn being posted, and this …

[flagged]

Kiwifarms and it's owner are well known to be transphobic. They have a subforum specifically for making fun of transgender people. Aside from what you mentioned in regards to the c…

He's somewhat misrepresenting the content of his forums: https://old.reddit.com/r/keffals/comments/1bkp9my/proof_kf_h... Keep that in mind when discussing how kiwifarms relates to …