Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwawayx134ax

throwawayx134ax

HN member
Joined
Thu, Sep 01, 2022, 9:16 PM UTC
HN karma
73
Public activity
16 items

About throwawayx134ax

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #37756130

    Not replying directly to you, except the "excuse anything" part: It's a funny idea that you owe your opponent in a war a "fighting chance", when in fact the exact OPPOSITE is true.…

  2. comment
    Comment #37268088

    Surprisingly quickly. A shot tower will make hundreds/thousands at a time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower

  3. comment
    Comment #35472115

    Unfortunately congress did vote. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Milit... They didn't declare war, which is unfortunate but congress did approve.

  4. comment
    Comment #34929304

    Question: Do you mean current as in movement of material, or current as in movement of electric fields? Or is that not a valid distinction in this case?

  5. comment
    Comment #34902871

    Crunchyroll?

  6. comment
    Comment #34782161

    Could have been really crappy weather and a very turbulent flight. I'm not sure I would be able to tell the difference between 2.5g and some of the severe jolts I've been in.

  7. comment
    Comment #34782043

    The article said it was inspected on landing at SFO.

  8. comment
    Comment #34779697

    Huh, given the steep dive, and equivalently steep climb-out, I wonder if they got hit by a microburst?

  9. comment
    Comment #34712572

    No, that's not true. Not following the rules strictly around duty time is a great way to have the FAA up your ass.

  10. comment
    Comment #34712520

    The increased risk people are talking about have been demonstrated in the form of crashed airliners. The entire rubric of reporting deviations early and often was developed as it w…

  11. comment
    Comment #34712405

    Your last two statements are not accurate. Autoland is not the common landing method unless you're in very poor visibility. Pilots DO use it in good weather or other situations, bu…

  12. comment
    Comment #34618027

    It's in the wikipedia article, but just want to call something out: That particular airframe 367-80 is in the Air and Space Udvar-Hazy museum at Dulles. It is gorgeous. The 747s fi…

  13. comment
    Comment #34222188

    Primarily, yes. There are international treaties regarding power, frequency, and transmissions that make sure you're not stomping on people. Each of the countries involved wants to…

  14. comment
    Comment #32929321

    Only to those who are looking for excuses to take offense. That's sort of like saying a "pyrrhic victory" is offensive to the greeks.

  15. comment
    Comment #32929108

    Flip that around. In a very real sense the criminal either chose to dehumanize his victims, or ignore the suffering he was causing (arguably worse). "Do unto others as you would ha…

  16. comment
    Comment #32683309

    This is great! Expect the EPA and the FAA to finally ban 100LL, which will be a great boon for everyone. Note, you will require an STC, but not poising yourself with lead will prob…