Viewing profile — throwawaykf05
throwawaykf05
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 22, 2014, 2:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 553
- Public activity
- 531 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwawaykf05
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17765584
This story is oft-repeated here but this paper provides convincing historical industrial evidence that it's a myth: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2355673
-
comment
Comment #12505735
Let's. Microsoft is the biggest spender on R&D amongst software companies and they sponsor a lot of research without clear immediate benefits. This is in stark contrast to all the …
-
comment
Comment #12505646
Or, asserting their legal right to protect their investment in R&D that latecomers like Linux and Android simply ripped off. Just a matter of perspective, really. Is just that give…
-
comment
Comment #11873445
Of course it does. The claims define what a patent covers. Noting that the vast majority (95%+?) of patents go unused, it's reasonable to assume that they have some correlation wit…
-
comment
Comment #11829940
In fact, the MP3 patents are directly responsible for spurring the development of Ogg Vorbis, which is arguably superior in some ways (see other comments). From Wikipedia: > Vorbis…
-
comment
Comment #11789442
> In what way is it "doing harm" to the patent system? Well here's a study showing that the user of the term "troll" had become widely used by media without any evidence to support…
-
comment
Comment #11760552
> ... grant a more even balance between the financial interests of the rightsholders and the cultural interests of the public at large... You mean the public that still exchanges t…
-
comment
Comment #11760456
The main reasons Netflix, Spotify and their ilk exist are a) piracy is still not user-friendly enough for everyone, and b) people vastly overestimate the risk of getting caught for…
-
comment
Comment #11760342
> TV and Movie owners already have copyright laws and DMCA laws giving them legal control on who gets their content and how it is used. And you have property laws giving you legal …
-
comment
Comment #11735844
IIRC, it was some bytes of object code they copied to be interoperable, so that string could just as well have been an array of random numbers as far as being the key to interopera…
-
comment
Comment #11735835
> Most corporations are still focused on just moving over to IaaS with compliance and security first Yes but my point is AWS has more mindshare and MS has more leverageable pre-exi…
-
comment
Comment #11726260
"We can only send you the data as fast as we can get it from Netflix. Please try speedtest.net, speedof.me or testmy.net to check your actual speed."
-
comment
Comment #11726216
Is not wanting to peer with somebody for free a violation of net neutrality?
-
comment
Comment #11726112
Microsoft put billions into Windows Phone and many (including me) think it's superior to iOS and Android, but what's its market share now? What I mean is, even if it is technically…
-
comment
Comment #11724917
Says the guy paid by Google. Tell me, when Alsup issued his "name your shills" order, was yours amongst those Google released? I certainly see you (or at least your handle) comment…
-
comment
Comment #11724775
Yes, and those semantics are purely functional, lacking any form of expression, which copyright expressly excludes from protection. The only reason binaries are copyright-protected…
-
comment
Comment #11724753
Another key point (in my view) is that these APIs are textual whereas BIOS / protocols / binary interfaces are purely functional. Copyright is meant to cover "forms of expression".…
-
comment
Comment #11724597
You said: > Sure. But music sharing didn't kill the industry then; there's little reason to believe it'll be the reason for its death now. To me that translated to: "Sharing some s…
-
comment
Comment #11704376
They put in most of the up-front money to make an artist big (or bigger). Is that not risk?
-
comment
Comment #11704365
>But music sharing didn't kill the industry then; there's little reason to believe it'll be the reason for its death now. Not a valid extrapolation. The Internet is billions of tim…
-
comment
Comment #11704344
Maybe they can afford to because they've figured out other ways to screw the public? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2G_spectrum_scam
-
comment
Comment #11699603
Are you saying the government does not do "vigorous enforcement of drug laws, long punishments for criminals"? These are topics that are the source of perennial complaints on HN. I…
-
comment
Comment #11695024
Actually the problem these days is that standard-essential patents are considered less valuable because they tend to require FRAND licensing. This is the problem companies like Mot…
-
comment
Comment #11694982
Not really, it's just compliance with the license that a piece of software is offered with. Things are no less silly in the world of open source. You are bound to honor the license…
-
comment
Comment #11694946
No, only abstract mathematical algorithms cannot be patented. Compression is a concrete application of mathematical algorithms.