Viewing profile — throwaway_434
throwaway_434
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 12:46 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 37
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwaway_434
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44395417
> Clearly, the GP is completely rational and quite well-informed. Yep you believe everything under the Sun when it comes to your Governments and institutions, when it has been prov…
-
comment
Comment #44395380
> The fact that there is zero such efforts visible leads me to the conclusion that Modi just doesn't give a fuck. Modi cares about Indians more than he cares about US citizens. Ind…
-
comment
Comment #44395336
> For one year. 14 other countries sanctioned India too. And what about it? When US sanctions any country, rest of the World follows. It is nothing new. > I couldn't find anything …
-
comment
Comment #44379667
> This phenomenon is large enough that I'm shocked it hasn't openly caused a diplomatic rift between the US and India, and New Delhi should have a vested interested in combating it…
-
comment
Comment #44379578
> And yes, I'd like particularly Narendra Modi to kneel Umm you are targeting the wrong person here. Majority of the scam call centers come from West Bengal, particularly Kolkata. …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #30648254
> Companies refusing to do business there and the eventual brain drain will do more damage than SWIFT. Only Western companies you mean? > but do you really think they’re trying to …
-
comment
Comment #30648158
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I am actually positively surprised that I wasn't downvoted to oblivion and most of the commenters engaged without considering it as "Russian …
-
comment
Comment #30648091
> The people of Libya did not have power over themselves Read the definition again. Then again. Then one more time. The definition states: "their government is under their own cont…
-
comment
Comment #30647943
> Now I get why you created a throwaway... what's the difference between France and Afghanistan ? What's the difference between Germany and North Korea ? What's the difference betw…
-
comment
Comment #30647878
> he is trying to lull you into a feeling that you have no moral ground and you should just do nothing, because nothing matters and must let it all happen. No I am not lulling him …
-
comment
Comment #30647855
> I think that's a really great question that a lot of people want to ask Putin. But not ask NATO? You don't see the hypocrisy here? Both Putin and NATO are wrong. Why is it so har…
-
comment
Comment #30647835
None of the points you mentioned are present in any Charter/Convention which Countries signed up to when joining the United Nations. None of it is "permissible". The only time it i…
-
comment
Comment #30642289
> Maybe Putin should have formed a defensive organization like NATO to give it some padding, instead of trying to take over. Like Soviet Union all over again? Not again. Why not ju…
-
comment
Comment #30642252
I am not defending Gaddafi. He was a brutal dictator. No doubt about it. I am just exposing hypocrisy of the "Free World" which I am a part of as well. I am just saying that there …
-
comment
Comment #30642234
Even Hitler (the worst Dictator in recent history) pales in comparison to how many countries the West has bombed and destroyed. Millions dying. Millions more homeless. Millions mov…
-
comment
Comment #30642225
> they could have veto'ed the resolution Have you read the UNSC resolution? The UNSC resolution did not call for invasion of Libya. Read it if you haven't. The main point of the UN…
-
comment
Comment #30641846
Have provided a detail answer here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30641837
-
comment
Comment #30641837
> Nato did not invade Libya This is not true at all. NATO did invade Libya on 31st March 2011. The UNSC resolution enforced a no-fly zone. It did not order a NATO invasion. Please …
-
comment
Comment #30641776
HN has limited me so I am posting a comment here. First of all, I am happy that people are actually engaging instead of dismissing the comment as Russian Propaganda (though few hav…
-
comment
Comment #30641458
> Libya wasn't a sovereign state It was and still is a Sovereign State. Except now it is a failed State thanks to Western invasion. I don't know where you get your definition of "S…
-
comment
Comment #30639769
> NATO's involvement in Libya was certainly a disastrous failure, but a disastrous failure from good intent and from multi-party consensus. Sorry but I have to call it what it is: …
-
comment
Comment #30639506
> Russia will try to find a way around these sanctions generally but it will be less efficient. It is not that easy to substitute everything. Russians may not care about latest bra…
-
comment
Comment #30639393
> Yeah, invasions suck, but the war in Libya wasn't to seize Libya and integrate it into NATO. It was arguably enforcing, not violating, the rule-based order. At least NATO has a b…
-
comment
Comment #30639363
Rather, do you in the free World see what is being shown to you in the free World as the Truth? Are you 100% sure that you aren't being shown a filtered version of what is actually…