Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwaway82652

throwaway82652

HN member
Joined
Sat, Mar 26, 2022, 6:32 PM UTC
HN karma
503
Public activity
261 items

About throwaway82652

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #31260573

    No? I don't know where you got that from.

  2. comment
    Comment #31260396

    You should be implementing a borrow checker or something like it. It's irresponsible not to do that. I'm serious about this. We know how to totally stop most use-after-free bugs du…

  3. comment
    Comment #31260316

    >You just need ANY other activity in order to get lost in the crowd And that's irrelevant because these tools are explicitly built for criminals to use them. I'm actually quoting w…

  4. comment
    Comment #31254299

    If there is another forum I would hope similar comments are also downvoted or deleted there because it's completely unrelated to the discussion, and you're also taking the opportun…

  5. comment
    Comment #31249866

    Even if you aren't a criminal, the fact is that privacy tools of this nature are explicitly relying on having enough volume of criminals and other illicit users to provide cover fo…

  6. comment
    Comment #31249831

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monero#Illicit_use

  7. comment
    Comment #31247769

    That comment is definitely out of line and trolling, but the author's attitude towards safety and security is still incredibly bad. Two wrongs don't make a right. I'm dismayed to s…

  8. comment
    Comment #31247471

    >they would be laughed out. No they wouldn't because almost all of those properties are actually desirable, and the only real achievement of ENS is to approximate all of that. Reme…

  9. comment
    Comment #31247087

    There's no name calling, "stupid" is the exact word you used. I'm stupider than a lawyer when it comes to all the details of contract law, because I didn't study it as much as they…

  10. comment
    Comment #31247044

    >Pot, meet kettle. No, this is incredibly wrong. The source here is me. You can choose to not believe me, but it's a source. I'm sorry but I just don't illegally carry a tape recor…

  11. comment
    Comment #31242777

    >If I as a developer want to license my code a certain way (and enforce that license in a certain way) what authority do these lawyers have to tell me I'm "stupid". Are you willing…

  12. comment
    Comment #31242725

    It's the same kind of unsourced low-information content focused on personal grievances that you would find in an angry twitter or 4chan comment. It's just intellectually lazy and b…

  13. comment
    Comment #31242687

    From the lawyers I've spoken to about this, Linus's view on the GPL and the chosen enforcement strategy has long been known to be nonsense. But nothing will change as long as the k…

  14. comment
    Comment #31242647

    You can just look up the Linux Foundation's tax statements, they're publicly available. Bryan Lunduke's recent writings are a bad source, they consist almost entirely of reactionar…

  15. comment
    Comment #31231227

    Use cmake-gui and it lists all the options for you. Or for the manual method, search in the project's cmake sources for lines starting with "option(".

  16. comment
    Comment #31231174

    I'm sorry but absolutely none of those applications need blockchains or even benefit from them at all. If you want to discuss this I could go into extreme detail why that's the cas…

  17. comment
    Comment #31231150

    >5. automake documentation discourages developers from globbing source files in source directories, and insists they list them individually. It's silly and just results in needless…

  18. comment
    Comment #31231081

    >take personal offense to me even daring to suggest that blockchain technology isn't completely useless Because it is actually useless. I've seen tons of people trying to explain t…

  19. comment
    Comment #31231062

    It doesn't really make sense to put your confidence in something questionable because something else happens to be bad. I get that you probably have a better explanation but this c…

  20. comment
    Comment #31231049

    >Completely disregarding any advances in cryptography or consensus Because those advances exist in spite of blockchains. I wish blockchains were a useful technology, but they actua…

  21. comment
    Comment #31224365

    In some aspects it does, for example a lot of Gnome apps have very minimal designs. That's ok for individual apps. The problem is, you can't really apply that to a chat tool that n…

  22. comment
    Comment #31224347

    >I think IRC's lack of features is actually an advantage and not a disadvantage. It's an advantage in the sense that if you want those features, you get to implement them yourself …

  23. comment
    Comment #31218668

    In this comment, it appears you took the word "expert" and defined it to mean "people who aren't actually experts" and then used that to dismiss them. I hope you can understand thi…

  24. comment
    Comment #31217968

    No, it's not even close to that. Analogies aren't that good of a tool to use here.

  25. comment
    Comment #31215203

    >No, it isn't. Pulseaudio is based on a push model, which is completely broken. These two statements are both very wrong. The push model is absolutely not broken, it's actually bet…