Viewing profile — throwaway415415
throwaway415415
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 22, 2019, 8:19 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 59
- Public activity
- 106 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwaway415415
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19197925
Hence why it can work with algorand.
-
comment
Comment #19195478
PoS by itself doesn't incentivize you to include transactions. That's called the "nothing at stake" problem.
-
comment
Comment #19195472
That is not true. If network partitions happen in bitcoin you are utterly ducked. The system will fork and good luck to recover from that with all the double spendings.
-
comment
Comment #19195072
There is no 51% attack in PoS system. Rather there is a more than 1/3rd attacker problem.
-
comment
Comment #19195049
What folks?
-
comment
Comment #19195046
Not true
-
comment
Comment #19195027
Wow wow wow
-
comment
Comment #19195022
Yes people can duck with a network by cutting cables. This works with all internet protocols.
-
comment
Comment #19194805
Usually interface{} is abused by java programmers. I agree that it's not great, but if you don't come from java or c++ chances you won't follow these patterns at least.
-
comment
Comment #19194791
Sure. Seems like they have the same experience than me then.
-
comment
Comment #19194764
Whats the difference with vault?
-
comment
Comment #19194753
Usually, for distributed systems in adversarial settings we talk about safety and liveness. Bitcoin doesn't have safety, and both bitcoin and algorand seems to fail the liveness te…
-
comment
Comment #19194714
You are not answering the question.
-
comment
Comment #19193040
So I was correct. Thanks. Indeed outlook is the first desktop client in your list.
-
comment
Comment #19193017
Unfortunately I am not parroting. If you are used to read code, and you read c++, you will see that templates are abused. No generics force devs to make their code clearer and thus…
-
comment
Comment #19193004
Because they are easily abused (look at c++) and makes code unreadable. Working around generics usually make the code clearer and thus more secure
-
comment
Comment #19192997
Its the hot thing for a reason. Adapt or be left out.
-
comment
Comment #19192990
It is already dying
-
comment
Comment #19192981
Algorand
-
comment
Comment #19192980
If no fees, what are the incentives to accept transactions in a block?
-
comment
Comment #19192963
Klol
-
comment
Comment #19192958
When you look at the big cryptographers behind vault and algorand you understand why.
-
comment
Comment #19192948
No it doesn't. Coda can work with Algorand's byzantine agreement protocol.
-
comment
Comment #19192942
Unless you're willing to provide information about the tech and how it is better than algorand or coda, I see your comment as just promotion scam.
-
comment
Comment #19192932
Yup. It's a shame that HN isn't willing to talk about the interesting new research instead of debating around the same philosophical discussions.