Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwaway415415

throwaway415415

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 22, 2019, 8:19 AM UTC
HN karma
59
Public activity
106 items

About throwaway415415

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #19197925

    Hence why it can work with algorand.

  2. comment
    Comment #19195478

    PoS by itself doesn't incentivize you to include transactions. That's called the "nothing at stake" problem.

  3. comment
    Comment #19195472

    That is not true. If network partitions happen in bitcoin you are utterly ducked. The system will fork and good luck to recover from that with all the double spendings.

  4. comment
    Comment #19195072

    There is no 51% attack in PoS system. Rather there is a more than 1/3rd attacker problem.

  5. comment
    Comment #19195049

    What folks?

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #19195027

    Wow wow wow

  8. comment
    Comment #19195022

    Yes people can duck with a network by cutting cables. This works with all internet protocols.

  9. comment
    Comment #19194805

    Usually interface{} is abused by java programmers. I agree that it's not great, but if you don't come from java or c++ chances you won't follow these patterns at least.

  10. comment
    Comment #19194791

    Sure. Seems like they have the same experience than me then.

  11. comment
    Comment #19194764

    Whats the difference with vault?

  12. comment
    Comment #19194753

    Usually, for distributed systems in adversarial settings we talk about safety and liveness. Bitcoin doesn't have safety, and both bitcoin and algorand seems to fail the liveness te…

  13. comment
    Comment #19194714

    You are not answering the question.

  14. comment
    Comment #19193040

    So I was correct. Thanks. Indeed outlook is the first desktop client in your list.

  15. comment
    Comment #19193017

    Unfortunately I am not parroting. If you are used to read code, and you read c++, you will see that templates are abused. No generics force devs to make their code clearer and thus…

  16. comment
    Comment #19193004

    Because they are easily abused (look at c++) and makes code unreadable. Working around generics usually make the code clearer and thus more secure

  17. comment
    Comment #19192997

    Its the hot thing for a reason. Adapt or be left out.

  18. comment
    Comment #19192990

    It is already dying

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #19192980

    If no fees, what are the incentives to accept transactions in a block?

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #19192958

    When you look at the big cryptographers behind vault and algorand you understand why.

  23. comment
    Comment #19192948

    No it doesn't. Coda can work with Algorand's byzantine agreement protocol.

  24. comment
    Comment #19192942

    Unless you're willing to provide information about the tech and how it is better than algorand or coda, I see your comment as just promotion scam.

  25. comment
    Comment #19192932

    Yup. It's a shame that HN isn't willing to talk about the interesting new research instead of debating around the same philosophical discussions.