Viewing profile — throwaway1851
throwaway1851
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 20, 2022, 10:10 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 389
- Public activity
- 152 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwaway1851
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35452342
I’ve had opiates for wisdom tooth extraction and a couple of relatively minor but very painful injuries. I was very glad to have them. They made the experiences much more bearable.…
-
comment
Comment #35434608
If you've reviewed the facts in this case, and that's what you took from it, then I seriously question your reading comprehension ability.
-
comment
Comment #35416407
And, with that, we’re back to pre-LLM chatbot design: intent classification, entity extraction, business logic, return a result. Only the whole process rests on a more rickety foun…
-
comment
Comment #35405183
Bard hasn’t been using Google’s best language models. I believe it just got an upgrade, however, and I’m now getting output that is significantly more coherent and useful than Chat…
-
comment
Comment #35355008
That’s only going to get you so far. Sparsely represented subjects have have an actual reality you’re trying to model. So while yes, you can generate synthetic data to interpolate …
-
comment
Comment #35352074
Especially weird since SFO is not in San Francisco.
-
comment
Comment #35351832
OpenAI’s fear-mongering efforts have been really transparent. As an example, in the ABC News piece, one of their employees discusses asking GPT to help build a bomb. Your employees…
-
comment
Comment #35351433
OpenAI explicitly disclaims ownership interest in the model outputs. A user who both generates outputs from OpenAI AND uses it to train a “foundational” model that competes with Op…
-
comment
Comment #35325283
I think a review of the state of frontend tooling will show that efficiency with respect to developer hours is not a widely shared priority. I only say this with only 50% intention…
-
comment
Comment #35320247
> It gets basic facts wrong and often times misunderstands what I'm trying to ask it. In haven’t tried Bard, but I’ve tried ChatGPT extensively and this sounds like a very good des…
-
comment
Comment #35298742
Any news on whether they're pursuing downstream weights? That's a really interesting question for me - if you started at the LLaMA weights and arrived somewhere else by supplying a…
-
comment
Comment #35296551
It’s not a lazy refrain, it’s a serious downside of the technology. It’s tiring and stressful to supervise the work product of an assistant that is extremely capable sometimes, but…
-
comment
Comment #35270202
A concern I have about OpenAI is that, if you're using their APIs to develop an application, they can mine your data to compete with you, or even beat you to market. They can do th…
-
comment
Comment #35262442
OpenAI disclaims ownership interest in the model output. If a subscriber (who has a contractual relationship with OpenAI) chooses to generate outputs that could be used to train a …
-
comment
Comment #35242281
A language model takes in a sequence of tokens and outputs a probability (0-1) for each token in the vocabulary (the set of all tokens the model knows). Based on this probability d…
-
comment
Comment #35242148
If we continue on this trajectory, I have a suspicion that the big players will increasingly cry “danger!” and, as Sam Altman has done already, call for government regulation of AI…
-
comment
Comment #35240007
Hm. I haven’t tried the local installs yet. However, when the Alpaca web demo was live, I did find it to be comparable (though not quite as capable) to davinci-003. It answered arb…
-
comment
Comment #35230004
I don’t put much stock in the claims about GPT4 “passing” professional exams. Many copies of previously administered exams are available, and the exams are formulaic in their const…
-
comment
Comment #35197586
Well, consider the source. These are the same people who withheld measly little GPT2 because it was too dangerous for the grubby masses. They profess to have all of this concern fo…
-
comment
Comment #35190267
$100. “For our initial run, fine-tuning a 7B LLaMA model took 3 hours on 8 80GB A100s, which costs less than $100 on most cloud compute providers. We note that training efficiency …
-
comment
Comment #35177887
It’s a really thorny set of issues. I remember reading a discussion recently about gender bias in coreference resolution. (Coreference resolution is the task of linking words such …
-
comment
Comment #35175920
I read it. I’d call it a press release.
-
comment
Comment #35175735
I’ve been playing with the Alpaca demo, and I’m really impressed! The outputs are generally excellent, especially for a model of that size, fine tuned on a $100 (!!) compute budget…
-
comment
Comment #35175661
Sorry. I wasn’t characterizing your comment; I was going off on a bit of a tangent.