Viewing profile — throwaway183839
throwaway183839
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 20, 2014, 1:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 75
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwaway183839
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9572425
The argument isn't saying that arithmetic is random. It's saying that a lot of properties of number systems behave as if they are random. A good example is finding arithmetic seque…
-
comment
Comment #9562052
Kind of off topic, but your comment reminded me of something that I've wondered about for a couple of months. I was in the US (NYC) last year and went to a music event at a bar. My…
-
comment
Comment #9364044
It's painfully obvious to me that I have this linguistic quirk, because my fiancé (who is not a computer geek) interjects with "buttons!" every time I start a sentence with "So..."…
-
comment
Comment #9240455
Everyone has a personal tolerance for risk. If you are diversified, then you decrease the risks that you are exposed to - possibly below your personal risk tolerance. That allows y…
-
comment
Comment #9188617
No - I just use a throwaway account by default (actually, several of them on different machines) because (a) sometimes I do want to comment on something without having my name atta…
-
comment
Comment #9188491
I think it's something that's worth pointing out occasionally. Male programmers tend to assume that all other programmers are male. Even if they don't actually think that, it slips…
-
comment
Comment #9188464
I'm kind of surprised that `enumerate` isn't defined in any standard libraries (as far as I know) since I need it pretty often. After a while spent programming in Haskell you would…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9188305
> It feels a little redundant to have to manually list out all the elements when the information is known statically, and updating the list will be necessary if the Peg type change…
-
comment
Comment #9130656
I can't speak for other teams, obviously. But almost everything we do would fall under the heading of "Bayesian methods". It's such a broad term that it would be hard to write a tr…
-
comment
Comment #9130650
What Virtu does to make money (market making and latency arbitrage on a milli- and microsecond timescale) is very, very far away from recognizing chart patterns and trading on them…
-
comment
Comment #9065451
What is being discussed in those links is commonly called complex systems theory [0] which is a mathematical/scientific/philosophical field concerned with how complexity (in the na…
-
comment
Comment #8885495
You are not allowed to do it, full stop.
-
comment
Comment #8885490
When most high frequency traders trade, they are not actively trying to manipulate the market for their own gain (in the cases where they are manipulating the market, they should o…
-
comment
Comment #8885470
Here's an interesting proposal - you charge a small amount (e.g. 0.001 of a cent) for every single order placement and rebate the proceeds to all market participants in proportion …
-
comment
Comment #8885459
The market clears any matching orders in effectively zero time (that is, it runs its matching algorithm to clear the book before it allows any new quotes to enter). After an order …
-
comment
Comment #8885451
Are you suggesting that the API should read your mind to discover whether you really intend to trade on an order that you enter?
-
comment
Comment #8871161
Theorem: No. Proof: Any rectangle made of Tetris pieces must have an even number of squares (in fact, a multiple of 4) and hence the same number of black/white squares. Every Tetri…
-
comment
Comment #8807755
Not necessarily. The standard way of valuing a bond is future value discounting. If the annualized interest rate between times 0 and T is r, then a payment of 1 unit at time T is w…
-
comment
Comment #8807738
Sure, pounds sterling had a different value in 1720 (although the question arises - a different value in comparison to what? The US dollar and the Euro didn't exist in 1720! You co…
-
comment
Comment #8776557
I don't think that log(a + b) = log(a) log(b) is a rule I'm familiar with!