Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwaway-aws9

throwaway-aws9

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 20, 2025, 6:24 PM UTC
HN karma
55
Public activity
17 items

About throwaway-aws9

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47676780

    How can you guarantee you'll have access to your 2TB Google Drive when they ban your Google account for breaching terms or accidentally tripping a circuit breaker across one of the…

  2. comment
    Comment #47088920

    resume driven development

  3. comment
    Comment #46905768

    > the so-called "internal" IT team can and will do just the same. but how is shadow IT gonna solve anything? it'll get kudos from the junior VP, chuckles from the SVP, but the CIO …

  4. comment
    Comment #46903203

    > You're just young. And I feel great! > Did you know that cloud cost less than what the internal IT team at a company would charge you? Yes. Internal IT teams ran old-school are i…

  5. comment
    Comment #46902170

    The cloud is a psyop, a scam. Except at the tiniest free-tier / near free-tier use cases, or true scale to zero setups. I've helped a startup with 2.5M revenue reduce their cloud s…

  6. comment
    Comment #46546766

    The lesson here is to always offer a larger tier than what your largest subscribers have.

  7. comment
    Comment #46329614

    So all it took was 10 posts over 17 days to get to first page. Nice app btw.

  8. comment
    Comment #46152501

    Tell me about it. My best hire had a horrible GPA. But I get it. If the job doesn't demand creativity but just following orders, GPA was a signal for it.

  9. comment
    Comment #46084646

    Thanks. I unsubscribed when I busted my weekly limit in a few hours on the Max 20x plan when I had to use Opus over Sonnet. It really feels like they were off by an order of magnit…

  10. comment
    Comment #46038372

    Point is 50TB isn't the limit. It's 50TB or 10M requests. Visitors aren't relevant.

  11. comment
    Comment #45984411

    yes but only 10M requests

  12. comment
    Comment #45984336

    With AWS, there's always a catch. In this case, it's for 10M requests. In other words, you pay $15 for 10M requests of up to 5MB each. [edit: looks like there's no overages but the…

  13. comment
    Comment #45924036

    650GB? Your data is small, fits on my phone. Dump the hyped tooling and just use gnu tools. Here's an oldie on the topic: https://adamdrake.com/command-line-tools-can-be-235x-faste…

  14. comment
    Comment #45759239

    I've seen how the cloud changed over 20 years from s3/ec2 in 2006 to what we have today. I've also seen how it's built at AWS. It's ironic they call it utility computing. What I al…

  15. comment
    Comment #45681377

    Should future attributions in white papers go to js8 from HN?

  16. comment
    Comment #45675354

    Right, but depending on your workload, compute might just be 1/3 to 1/2 of your spend. The remainder going on storage, networking (egress and internal between regions & AZs), LBs, …

  17. comment
    Comment #45647335

    You have to remember that health status dashboards at most (all?) cloud providers require VP approval to switch status. This stuff is not your startup's automated status dashboard.…