Viewing profile — throwaway-42808
throwaway-42808
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 7:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 47
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throwaway-42808
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45722022
But that's such a good idea though
-
comment
Comment #39554579
They will! For over an hour, they've been trying to think of a new joke
-
comment
Comment #39476439
https://airforms.com/ and https://visualdb.com/ appear to be the same thing?
-
comment
Comment #39239884
From https://pkl-lang.org/blog/introducing-pkl.html#editor-suppor... : "We are also releasing two other plugins: our VS Code plugin, and our neovim plugin. Today, these plugins onl…
-
comment
Comment #38586506
How easy would it be to make a Socket-based GUI program, stick it on a thumb drive and run it on a friend's PC? The Distribution Guide ( https://socketsupply.co/guides/#distributio…
-
comment
Comment #37807490
probably! You might like the Magnetic Resonator Piano: http://instrumentslab.org/research/mrp.html
-
comment
Comment #37801298
Daisy and Bela are great for low-latency interactive audio :) But I think Arduino is a good choice for this. 1. The microcontroller isn't generating audio onboard, it's driving sol…
-
comment
Comment #37796043
Design feedback: Active tab has no contrast at all. Same with: select options, side menu. Slightly harsh but probably an easy fix! To me Neobrutalism is all about being brutally re…
-
comment
Comment #27523954
Probably Bret Victor - "Inventing on Principle" (2012) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII
-
comment
Comment #25981882
Sounds easy enough: Use the well written frameworks as needed, and you can make successful end products too. What would be your advice to someone seeking to do this? e.g. - is it s…
-
comment
Comment #25978966
The frameworks and tools aren't all that stable, reliable, or intentionally designed compared with what Java programmers might be used to. I don't fault anyone for trying to get of…
-
comment
Comment #25752406
Yep :) It's a weird way to try to save money, imo. Down the line it just leads to confusion and repeat work. They also underinvest in documentation, with the same result.
-
comment
Comment #25752150
That's encouraging. I haven't had the same experience yet, but I haven't worked for someone who pays for full search history.