Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throwadobe

throwadobe

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 5:33 PM UTC
HN karma
211
Public activity
99 items

About throwadobe

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47747374

    > they definitely have the capability to do it. You'd think so, but I guess they don't.

  2. comment
    Comment #46673847

    I mean, it's not like I trashed it or compared it to Mozart—I even made sure to include "interesting, stimulating, or tonally remarkable" in an attempt to preempt that latter pushb…

  3. comment
    Comment #46673705

    I'm not, I promise

  4. comment
    Comment #46673701

    [flagged]

  5. comment
    Comment #46673466

    [flagged]

  6. comment
    Comment #41421798

    > I am not familiar with what you’re claiming here about the matter being judged collectively in due time with Brazilian due process - care to share a source? Top article on G1: ht…

  7. comment
    Comment #41421038

    [flagged]

  8. comment
    Comment #41420084

    Because doctors never misdiagnose or prescribe wrong medications... I'd rather make my own choices, thank you very much.

  9. comment
    Comment #41419983

    [flagged]

  10. comment
    Comment #41419829

    [flagged]

  11. comment
    Comment #41418756

    Looks like this uses DOT? Click on "Editor" at the top

  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #41418628

    [flagged]

  14. comment
    Comment #41418620

    I never said they were, but the judge isn't wrong for deciding on legality rather than morality.

  15. comment
    Comment #41417875

    [flagged]

  16. comment
    Comment #41417864

    What's happening in Pakistan has no bearing on what's happening in Brazil. Just because "twitter is banned" in both countries doesn't mean it was banned for the same reasons or tha…

  17. comment
    Comment #41417857

    Please don't buy into the lazy narrative that this is a "maverick judge". That's an incorrect take that is fueled by political propaganda.

  18. comment
    Comment #41417847

    Irrelevant. Disagreeing on moral terms is not the same as deciding it has not followed the law and must face repercussions, which is what was decided here.

  19. comment
    Comment #41417842

    You can "be from Brazil" and still not understand the matter. Legal decisions are not a matter of "I agree" or "I disagree". They are a matter of law and facts. How exactly was the…

  20. comment
    Comment #41417829

    [flagged]

  21. comment
    Comment #41416794

    Not for legal purposes, it isn't. Unless you're arguing the morality of the Brazilian Constitution and the limits it imposes on freedom of speech in some scenarios, such as outlawi…

  22. comment
    Comment #41416781

    Factually incorrect. Plenty of free and open information in other networks in Brazil and through its free press.

  23. comment
    Comment #41416725

    Manager mode assumes that workers clock in and do what they can to drive the company forward. But there is no altruism among workers. Their decisions are for themselves first and f…

  24. comment
    Comment #41416706

    It takes effort, requires goodwill, has damaging implications to internal politics and ultimately is not the best way to maximize tenure at C-level roles. Executives are solving fo…

  25. comment
    Comment #41414204

    Are senators or pastors above the law? Go read the decision: https://www.conjur.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/PET-124... More generally, one doesn't get to say "No, judge, I wo…