Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throw_pm23

throw_pm23

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 13, 2022, 11:53 AM UTC
HN karma
1,308
Public activity
581 items

About throw_pm23

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43554850

    The top ten countries by air pollution listed in another comment hardly produce anything the developed world uses, they mostly export natural resources.

  2. comment
    Comment #43510672

    Yeah, I call the company Facebook, I don't care enough to follow their terminology, and I don't keep track of their products.

  3. comment
    Comment #43510088

    And Facebook instead of Meta, although if I think of it, I'd rather not say any of those in any context.

  4. comment
    Comment #43497797

    Even if there were no reliable studies, the precautionary principle would suggest to limit food that is highly processed and somehow of a novel form, very different from what was c…

  5. comment
    Comment #43373335

    I loved the typo "parking your cat" -- that would indeed be the height of decadence.

  6. comment
    Comment #43373314

    More likely, by a huge margin, since it takes only checking a box in some software system, whereas the alternatives you mention need a lot of messy work to achieve.

  7. comment
    Comment #43336955

    Sorry if my question appears ignorant, but how quickly is quantum really coming? If your prior belief is "nothing practical is ever likely to come out of quantum computing", then s…

  8. comment
    Comment #43318143

    Yes, I guess in most of Europe the 200-250 years between Rembrandt and van Gogh is exactly when family names solidified from a simple description "the one from village X" or "son o…

  9. comment
    Comment #43311764

    Typst may have its pros and momentum (I haven't tried it myself yet), but I find this attitude and language used by its proponents very offputting. I've only heard Knuth and Lampor…

  10. comment
    Comment #43310906

    There is a trivial alternative that military strategists have been suggesting for decades. For a nation of 20+ M, having a reservist army of 1M would be feasible and make the islan…

  11. comment
    Comment #43310879

    That's an interesting perspective, that could be used as an argument by both camps. You say more social democracy, someone else might say, more social cohesion due to shared cultur…

  12. comment
  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #43264422

    I think the midwit meme captures this best, where at both ends of the IQ bell curve the characters say "I hate technology", and the guy in the middle loves it.

  15. comment
    Comment #43199637

    So why isn't the charitable interpretation that the system works well, there is even correction built into it, since they backtrack when necessary?

  16. comment
    Comment #43138463

    If institutions can only be created and never destroyed, how many institutions per person would we end up with?

  17. comment
    Comment #43138457

    I think the point of disagreement is even whether "things have already happened" have really happened or not. From reading his posts, my understanding is that he thinks the claims …

  18. comment
    Comment #43121592

    I think he is playing it smart. The more fringe/contrarian it is, the bigger the payoff if he turns out to be right. So far nothing of much use came out of QC, and if nothing will,…

  19. comment
    Comment #43118637

    It's worse, it will (likely) never work at all.

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #43118516

    I find the opposite, he often makes some ridiculous claim in the post, the comments (the ones he lets through) rightfully point out how wrong he was, then he cherry-picks and engag…

  22. comment
    Comment #43118494

    Yes, just like putting two bricks onto each other is a first step to the moon.

  23. comment
    Comment #43116972

    Another recent writeup that adds some nuance to this (and other claims), summarizing the quantum-skeptic positions: https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/02/17/robert-alicki-mich...

  24. comment
    Comment #43112320

    You seem to merge two different points. Not reading based on sloppiness is defensible. Not reading based on the author's resume less so.

  25. comment