Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — throw46365

throw46365

HN member
Joined
Thu, May 30, 2024, 5:25 PM UTC
HN karma
213
Public activity
151 items

About throw46365

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40636346

    I'm not insinuating. I'm asking. It's a pretty reasonable question for both of them. Perhaps more for the CFO, given what we know of Altman's, er, lack of candour with the board wh…

  2. comment
    Comment #40636317

    When the iPad came out, people actually mostly said it was just a big iPhone. It is, in fact, pretty much still just a big iPhone. It turns out that's enough for a lot of people.

  3. comment
    Comment #40636301

    It's odd how unexcited Apple people often sound when they say they couldn't be more excited .

  4. comment
    Comment #40636244

    > Palm CEO on the iPhone This quote pre-dates the iPhone by a couple of months. So it doesn't remotely qualify as a "failed product" comment. It's just a bad prediction. (And it's …

  5. comment
    Comment #40636205

    Honest question: Do they not each worry they are each, in their own way, going to be Linda Yaccarino?

  6. comment
    Comment #40630099

    The lesson I learned from the dot-com era is that people who are dependent on the hype to make profit will crane their necks to believe the hype. Salespeople, executives, engineers…

  7. comment
    Comment #40629427

    Right. I mean... I sometimes think that Webpack is a malign, inscrutable intelligence! :-) But at least it's supposed to be deterministic. And there's a chance someone else will be…

  8. comment
    Comment #40629379

    But not the now, quite obviously. Colour me cynical but I don't feel like pretending the future is here only to have to have to fix its blind incompetence.

  9. comment
    Comment #40629358

    Indeed, and presumably well before 1965, which is when Greater London was created. Most of the non-disambiguated High Streets will be in the Greater London boroughs (Bromley, Bexle…

  10. comment
    Comment #40629124

    Free idea: a website called But Humans Also, where one collects bad justifications for applying LLMs. the dot-com is available!

  11. comment
    Comment #40629105

    [flagged]

  12. comment
    Comment #40629067

    The "zen" of LLMs is that they do not see a real distinction between these two things, or either of these two things and success ;-)

  13. comment
    Comment #40629048

    I dunno. I tend to annoy people when taking on jobs by telling people what I am concerned about and do not understand, and then sharing with them the extent to which I have managed…

  14. comment
    Comment #40628952

    > You could say the same about the output of a compiler. Except, for starters, that you're not using the LLM to replace a compiler. You're using it to replace a teammate.

  15. comment
    Comment #40628769

    > I don't think this is indicative of people who don't know what they're doing. I think this is indicative of people using "AI" tools to help with programming at all. I think using…

  16. comment
    Comment #40628522

    One day... building a 4x5 is next.

  17. comment
    Comment #40627711

    I shoot digital, and only black and white film, these days. (I need to build a darkroom so I can print again) But the thing that really hooked me deep into photography was 6x6 tran…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #40625490

    I am pretty certain I am a Weird Nerd. I have good reasons to consider myself neurodivergent (and others do consider me such). There are definite divergences that have caused me pr…

  20. comment
    Comment #40625051

    TBH I cannot, which is why I talked of doubt in the quantity comparison, and it’s a fair point to pull me up on. My broader point was that people associate film with chemicals ofte…

  21. comment
    Comment #40623574

    Digital cameras use more (and much worse) toxic chemicals. It’s just that you don’t get involved with them personally. I doubt most digital camera owners ever shoot enough to get t…

  22. comment
    Comment #40623528

    Well, it will never achieve the economy of scale it had. So it will always be more expensive. But the same is true for art inks, I imagine.

  23. comment
    Comment #40623508

    I don’t think I can answer because again I think I would not put myself in that position. I am going to retreat from this argument because this entire topic has me questioning my p…

  24. comment
    Comment #40623191

    It’s more perfect than digital. Consider this about the original slide: it was physically there with the photographer when the photograph was taken. It is stained with the chemical…

  25. comment
    Comment #40621855

    Unless I am mistaken in my reading of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act#Legislativ... suggests it went through the parliament in a now pretty normal way. They…