Viewing profile — throw234234234
throw234234234
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 28, 2024, 1:10 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 106
- Public activity
- 128 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About throw234234234
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49151017
I suspect this is a "what you are used to" and have trained yourself to look out for over many years of code reading.
-
comment
Comment #48670990
You are thinking growth in product and opportunities. But that doesn't always require or translate to more engineering especially in the face of AI efficiency if that work to suppo…
-
comment
Comment #48638998
My opinion is that it is because the measure isn't aimed at technical people. It's aimed at clients that just want to specify what they want -> then get what they want without an e…
-
comment
Comment #48130070
> A better move would be to stop allowing people to graduate in CS. Its a free market if you are the one paying for it solely. If you are willing to pay for the degree then the dem…
-
comment
Comment #48104524
If the industry is to shrink this is the best way it can. Stop people entering while they are young and can pivot into something with better returns. Keep the experienced people wh…
-
comment
Comment #48003027
Searched online for it - there is this one https://github.com/fsprojects/fsharp-hashcollections . YMMV.
-
comment
Comment #48002684
My personal anecdote when I talk to people - everyone when talking about their job w.r.t AI is like "at least I'm not a software engineer!". To give a hint this isn't just a US phe…
-
comment
Comment #47970428
I find algo performance is a consideration, but so is overall system performance especially in the face of concurrency, staleness, update rate, data processing size, consistency of…
-
comment
Comment #47697669
F# has since gotten Functional State machines which make many computation expressions more efficient ( https://github.com/fsharp/fslang-design/blob/main/FSharp-6.0... ). Been there…
-
comment
Comment #47686336
Agree. Anthrophic in particular have been quite clear in what they are trying to do. Every blog post about every new model almost dismisses every other use case other than coding -…
-
comment
Comment #46941610
The question really is what you think the long term direction of SWE as a profession is. If we need juniors later and senior's become expensive that's a nice problem to have mostly…
-
comment
Comment #46939308
Domain knowledge and gatekeeping. We don't know what is required in their role fully, but we do know what is required in ours. We also know that we are the target of potentially tr…
-
comment
Comment #46675362
I think it's pretty clear that Anthrophic was the main AI lab pushing code automation right from the start. Their blog posts, everything just targeted code generation. Even their h…
-
comment
Comment #46594562
All I can say to that is "I hope so too"; but logic is telling me otherwise at this point. Because the alternative, as evidenced by this thread, isn't all that good. The fear/dread…
-
comment
Comment #46583937
> disrupting others careers is why you have a career in the first place. Not every software project has or did this. In fact I would argue many new businesses exist that didn't exi…
-
comment
Comment #46537812
They commoditized their complement to their hardware/infra, that being software. Good for them and the value of tech will shift to what is still scarce relatively.
-
comment
Comment #46537790
Because of point 3 most SWE's are also hesistant to pay for software. The positive feedback loop of "I did well out of this so i will support others as well" is over. When you are …
-
comment
Comment #46537678
I think AI has come as the industry was somewhat maturing and most frameworks/software had previous incarnations that mostly did the same thing or could be done adhoc anyway. The n…
-
comment
Comment #46537651
In the face of LLM's it won't be rational for many people to open source their work. People don't want their work/effort being used against them.
-
comment
Comment #46537634
Open source ended up disrupting the software profession; just not in the way people thought it would. If we didn't have open source arguably developers would be more secure, way mo…
-
comment
Comment #46522570
My theory is that this (juniors unable to get in) is generally how industries/jobs die and phase out in a healthy manner that causes the least pain to its workers. I've seen this h…
-
comment
Comment #46296599
I wouldn't be surprised if it is only software and creative jobs that die. Whilst I still find it expensive to buy a house, get food, and the grunt work will still need labor. What…
-
comment
Comment #46296482
TL;DR: There's many more ways to lose money or barely break even than gain from AI investing. Because unlike previously: - You can't invest in these things directly (mostly private…
-
comment
Comment #46201611
Amazing how much investment has mostly gone to eliminate one job category; ironically what was meant to be the job of the future "learn to code". To be honest on current trajectory…
-
comment
Comment #46201506
Indeed. I do wonder if the inventors of the "transformer architecture" knew all the potential Pandora's boxes they were opening when they invented it. Probably not. No one wants to…