Viewing profile — thro1
thro1
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 9:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 196
- Public activity
- 590 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thro1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45925625
There is no way to make JavaScript so limited in scope as XSLT is. But what I want only is XSLT on live DOM nodes, when editing. Simple templating good engine, and to stay. Not a f…
-
comment
Comment #45925596
There is no way to make JavaScript so limited in scope as XSLT is. But what I want only is XSLT on live DOM nodes. Not a fancy stuff.
-
comment
Comment #45920481
Edit: nRF52840 chip can have 12 Analog Inputs, ESP32S3 20 - e.g. ESP32-S3-WROOM-1 - but XIAO ESP32S3 and XIAO nRF52840 have 6 only, there are others with more pins (AFAIR up to ~12…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45914062
It looks like all Hall sensor or similar analog keyboards came after that ? (exception: Scrollpoint in IBM keyboards)
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #45913405
There are diodeless (no matrix) split keyboards ( https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/1dh9o8k/... ) like Cantor: https://github.com/diepala/cantor . They use chips …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45880687
For me, it happened in that moment when XMLHttpRequest was the only working common denominator for few "new" techniques browsers - as iframe was over everything you couldn't just l…
- story
-
comment
Comment #45864798
Just.. and for so long: XSLT is WWW standard, JavaScript is not (it's ECMA standard) - and there is no JavaScript specification on W3C pages . ( https://www.w3.org/wiki/JavaScript …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45864138
https://www.igalia.com/chats/xslt-liam So basically browsers had this [..] the question now is there is no investment in this. None. And there hasn't been for a really long time fr…
-
comment
Comment #45861696
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11146#issuecomment-275... panos: next item, removing XSLT. There are usage numbers. stephen: I have concerns. I kept this up to date historica…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45856970
by definition XSLT is more secure than JavaScript.
-
comment
Comment #45856827
That's our freedom of not being forced to use JavaScript for everything being taken away !
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45796359
(?) - then more about the tactic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44994459 (web looks like nails for that tool we have) now how about that: Chrome voluntarily decides to disjo…
-
comment
Comment #45786482
The standard so far is to respect existing standards still in use, peoples effort and work done already - but not to outsource bug fixing costs by forcing any of that to be redone …
-
comment
Comment #45785513
- as in Europe, I don't see neither how taxpayers money or users time (if still alive) could be forcibly used to cover the costs of some far away corporation savings (on bug fixing…
-
comment
Comment #45784237
Moreover: there is no JS solution being so stable and for so long as that standard: "25 year old version of XSLT" . Can be "made with JS" doesn't mean that by chance it would be in…
-
comment
Comment #45781209
Wasn't the social contract that get the market share that you can use Chrome to browse all the web already existing as well as by using the other browsers - means not discriminatin…