Viewing profile — thrmsforbfast
thrmsforbfast
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 1:34 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 455
- Public activity
- 133 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thrmsforbfast
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18427678
This comment ignores the problem that parent identified: >> But it has the net effect of pushing the tax burden down onto smaller companies who are competing with the Amazons of th…
-
comment
Comment #18390524
I agree with parent that this whole thread comes off as extremely hyperbolic. I've known this information about my friends and neighbors for the better part of the last decade. In …
-
comment
Comment #18377146
Perhaps. But that's not a compelling argument against this bill. Perfect enemy of better and all that.
-
comment
Comment #18377132
Companies will have a Chief Privacy Officer whose job is basically to provide oversight and, of course, absorb the risk. That person will probably be paid well. I'm actually OK wit…
-
comment
Comment #18377110
Startups aren't even covered by this bill until they've gained lots of traction (1 million users and 50MM+ gross receipts). At which point, again again IFF their business is data h…
-
comment
Comment #18377072
It is. Read Sec 5.(d). It's not like people will be thrown in prison because their DB wasn't patched quickly enough. They have to knowingly and intentionally lie to the federal gov…
-
comment
Comment #18377021
Nope. The bill defines covered entities in Sec. 2.(5)(A) and 2.(5)(B). In particular, companies with less than $50,000,000 in gross receipts and information on fewer than 1,000,000…
-
comment
Comment #18366927
Open source doesn't ensure quality code. Ideally the code would be part of the peer review process, but code review is really expensive, so who knows how that would play out.
-
comment
Comment #18360081
A lot of your news is not just "not-depressing". It's actively uplifting. In fact, most of the stories on the front page are "feel good" stories. It'd be cool/useful if you could p…
-
comment
Comment #18359686
> As in most descriptions of it are annoyingly ambiguous. My very first interviewer (intentionally) didn't spec fizzbuzz correctly. The real test was whether the candidate listened…
-
comment
Comment #18359364
Well, no, generally they can't shove it off on their creditor and say "there we're even", if that's what you mean. There's a whole field of law about bankruptcy. In particular, que…
-
comment
Comment #18358972
That's called an apartment building. Or a large house with many bedrooms. Both happen all the time. In fact, just last weekend I let 20+ people into my house for a party. The notio…
-
comment
Comment #18358533
> Patent == monopoly For a very specific definition of monopoly (in particular, monopoly over use of a specific resource, not monopoly in the market sense). In that same sense of t…
-
comment
Comment #18358454
Steko's comment might be a good place to continue that particular conversation. Such an approach would require careful design of incentive structures so that patents remain accessi…
-
comment
Comment #18357051
Shipping & Transit LLC had not only a prototype, but also a product: Jones developed this into a service called BusCall, which had some modest success. I think the actual solution …
-
comment
Comment #18350508
Being "good with computers" does not fetch $200k. Knowing the difference between "file" and "directory" and being able to touch type won't get you a $200K engineering position at G…
-
comment
Comment #18348943
My comment was specific to the USA and maybe even certain parts of the USA. > Most tradies here have their own business Maybe this really is true in Australia. IDK. People say this…
-
comment
Comment #18348908
> Still, it is very hard to make developers pay for software. I don't think this is true. There are lots of things that developers throw money at, and each developer can easily thi…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18347765
Do you have family or friends in the trades? I always get called elitist/out-of-touch when I point this out, but it's really true that most people working in trades do $50k with me…
-
comment
Comment #18347616
This isn't unique to tech, either. In a lot of enterprise sales orgs, literally everyone is a "VP".
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18346650
This is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as anything except a temporary, remedial, and aspirational policy (McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail, Steelworkers v. Weber, Johnso…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18333706
And if you don't recover anything, you can also write this off on taxes for the business you hopefully incorporated for the purpose of renting your equipment through.