Viewing profile — thraway180306
thraway180306
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 06, 2018, 2:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 157
- Public activity
- 110 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thraway180306
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41139387
For context, you have a consulting business, and spoke at a conference about AI in administering justice organized under auspices of recently ousted illiberal government of Poland.…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26847236
Yeah, wow, whitepaper expects their reserve matched by other farmers only after 21 years of Chia mining/plotting. I see Bram Cohen got the original authors of "proof of space" or w…
-
comment
Comment #23355476
The whole point of Bousquet study was comparability, so it had to be the lowest common denominator, especially in a field that defines SotA differently year to year in each wave of…
-
comment
Comment #23355465
You are complaining how the article doesn't mention GANs while replying to a comment about article's treatment of GANs. Revealing you are biased against even reading the biased art…
-
comment
Comment #18535691
That's a significant goalpost move. From debating particular mechanisms and postulated inevitability of AI, to assuming full blown strong Church-Turing-Deutsch principle and moving…
-
comment
Comment #18530456
All chemistry is ultimately quantum, same with rocks and everything up to celestial bodies (meaningfully, the moon Hyperion decoheres). For most of calculations though classical mo…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17943476
I find these threats doubtful, I don't see the editorial board wasting their life on sustained activism over the years chasing remnants of something they helped to create and what …
-
comment
Comment #17943027
The process, as told by the author, was that one of the editors invited to submit, and three weeks later it was published upon which the rest of the editorial board took notice and…
-
comment
Comment #17941757
Sorry, but the ArXiv does have a moderation team and stuff is being removed. Alike, most online journals remove stuff by wholly replacing it with a retraction notice. Journals prin…
-
comment
Comment #17941443
Sorry, but it is for everybody to decide. Reviewers don't have a sacred sanction and exclusive right to judge. Many a time in cases of plagiarism I worked through I've met with thi…
-
comment
Comment #17941407
What the parent charitably didn't stress is that this proof is the totality of mathematical work in this paper. The rest is a stream of words. As such it is a work of social scienc…
-
comment
Comment #17819390
It captures more of the spatial (metric topological) arrangement in the set. Example they give in the paper is the MINST dataset where distinctly looking digits like 1 and 0 get se…
-
comment
Comment #17819155
Without (arbitrary) scaling normalization PCA gives different results with change of dimensional units, that is principal components depend on choice of units or scaling.
-
comment
Comment #17818792
structure to the space of prime factors There is topological structure https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2879/mapping-natura... http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/arithmetic+topol…
-
comment
Comment #17818716
PCA is dimensionally invalid, it destroys, not preserves structure and consists of arbitrary linear algebra operations. It is "less arbitrary" the way x86 assembly is "less arbitra…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17770313
Not true, a lot of mathematical problems behave better (but other semiclassical approaches also exist). As for the epicycles comparison, it's actually apt. They could have given co…
-
comment
Comment #17769973
This is something different. Zeilinger paints himself disproving realism alone and has a well known philosophical stance/bias here. Local realism testing here however is about bein…
-
comment
Comment #17769841
Relativistic extensions aren't pleasant in standard QM either. Bohmian formalism would require something perhaps no less aesthetically repulsive, but surely more alien: a preferred…
-
comment
Comment #17769146
It would help if these weren't all from the same single source: Zeilinger's Vienna group and friends. On the other hand formalism works seamlessly mathematically, which cannot be s…
-
comment
Comment #17663552
It is in fact age limited precisely to combat ageism of the early 20th century. Otherwise only elders would get it (would they outlive the queue of their masters), when it's irrele…
-
comment
Comment #17617667
I made the joke on you.