Viewing profile — thinkafterbef
thinkafterbef
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 6:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 203
- Public activity
- 45 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thinkafterbef
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48804359
Finally proper stale-while-revalidate support!
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #45800666
JetKVM | Senior Fullstack Engineer | Remote (CET ±3) | Full-Time | Go / TypeScript / WebRTC | Open Source JetKVM builds open-source KVM-over-IP hardware that lets you control any c…
- story
-
story
Show HN: Performance GitHub Actions runners powered by Gaming CPUs
Hey HN, BuildJet makes GitHub Actions faster, by running the workflows on our Gaming CPU cloud. You still get to keep everything GitHub Actions, we simply replace the underlying Gi…
-
comment
Comment #33920681
That's precisely what we will do! You'll be able to customize the runner image however you want, and it will be running on very fast NVMe SSDs.
-
comment
Comment #33920345
Disclaimer: Co-founder of https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions While more cores can certainly help with certain types of projects, such as those that can be easily parallelized,…
- story
-
comment
Comment #32245203
Yeah, it's kind of a trope by now. However, we felt it was justified when Google Lighthouse wanted to use BuildJet.
-
comment
Comment #32245164
Oh, should probably add that to the docs. Anyway, they are 120 GB.
-
comment
Comment #32244269
I'm a bit biased as one of the founders of BuildJet, but we solve this exact issue. BuildJet for GitHub Actions, plugs elegantly into GitHub Actions. With 1-line change in your con…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #30925648
Hey founder of BuildJet here, With BuildJet for GitHub Actions, you can get up to 64 vCPU as a GitHub Actions runner. We plug right into your existing setup and have a significantl…
-
comment
Comment #30063733
Incoming shameless plug; if you don’t have to handle the hosting runners, but still to reap the benefits of having proper hardware (close to the metal). Check out BuildJet for GitH…
- story
-
comment
Comment #29397046
Nice wording with 'per core performance'. We had difficulties properly conveying this point in our product when comparing our CI runners[1] to GitHub Actions CI Runner. I will be u…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #29006939
BuildKite lets you run their CI agents on your own hardware. Much like self-hosted runner in GitHub Actions. BuildJet for GitHub Actions is a managed service, where we provide the …
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28850329
Yeah, you're right, there is a tool called act[1] that lets users test the GitHub Actions CI runs toward their local machine. The implementation looks very similar to GitHub Action…
-
comment
Comment #28850248
Hey, Parallelism can solve a subset of CI performance issues, but in our experience, it tends to increase complexity and not improving performance that much. Regarding security, ju…