Viewing profile — thingexplainer
thingexplainer
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 08, 2016, 10:24 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 91
- Public activity
- 67 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thingexplainer
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12765002
And yet there are millions of people using the Internet and we have to protect them with the army we have.
-
comment
Comment #12765001
And yet there are millions of people using the Internet and we have to protect them with the army we have. I hope we'll see something like Marlinspike's Notaries becoming widesprea…
-
comment
Comment #12764947
Have you considered generating these screenshots automatically? It seems like if you did, this would protect you against both typos and insiders.
-
comment
Comment #12764929
When will it be?
-
comment
Comment #12764469
I think the solution is to formally verify your hardware with a prover that is aware of electromagnetic forces. Software has to assume correctness of hardware (rad-hard application…
-
comment
Comment #12764362
"Formal verification makes your code invulnerable against a very specific (though very powerful) attacker"
-
comment
Comment #12764322
> Extortion in the form of ransom-ware, theft in the form of stealing bitcoin from exchanges. (Mt. Gox, and a more recent case.) This is exactly what I meant. I guess I could have …
-
comment
Comment #12764280
It doesn't have to become public. It probably shouldn't.
-
comment
Comment #12756066
Perhaps the DNI should consider offering some form of clemency for other people who brought "homework" out of their SCIF to turn themselves in.
-
comment
Comment #12755610
People are scammed out dollars, bitcoins, and iTunes gift cards. Ponzi schemes happen everywhere. The real money in bitcoin-denominated crime is in theft and extortion anyway. If p…
-
comment
Comment #12755368
For a sufficiently large monitor I'd expect you to generate multiple five-pointed stars on the first try.
-
comment
Comment #12755344
Regarding your first point, the trouble (at least in this instance) is that this logic doesn't apply when you're looking for Roger Waters and calling everyone in the phone book wit…
-
comment
Comment #12755308
The correct answer would have been to pick a reasonable assumption (before you ask, your own judgement determines what is reasonable) for what "useful" is, and to clarify that that…
-
comment
Comment #12754030
Was the service you were receiving before they offered two-day shipping any better? Or just more consistent leading to less disappointment?
-
comment
Comment #12754015
Saying "something is weird" certainly implies "this does not match my expectations."
-
comment
Comment #12753921
This has been SOP in certain places for a long time.
-
comment
Comment #12752799
Extraordinary claims don't require more evidence than other claims. A more accurate statement would be, "claims I'm skeptical of will require convincing evidence for me to be swaye…
-
comment
Comment #12752661
Which is a pretty flimsy reason to believe an adversary might find leverage against you. But hoarding is a force multiplier in the adversary's favor.
-
comment
Comment #12752619
I agree, I never meant to imply that I thought contractors were less loyal. I appreciate the depth of your responses and hope I haven't given offense. There are just so many of the…
-
comment
Comment #12750415
He must've hidden it in his Rubix cube.
-
comment
Comment #12750377
As an outsider looking in, it seems like there have been a lot of DLEs due to contractors though. Theres the obvious example of Snowden, but also the QinetiQ breach ( https://www.b…
-
comment
Comment #12749736
It seems like contractors are a massive attack surface for the DoD. I do wonder why they gave a clearance to someone who was apparently a hoarder. If collecting things that interes…
-
comment
Comment #12749712
Active publishing contemporary historical smut fiction, it would seem.
-
comment
Comment #12749703
How principled of you to ruin someone's career and let them spend the rest of their life in prison.
-
comment
Comment #12741252
I'd love to hear more about why.