Viewing profile — thesmtsolver2

Your comment implied that. Don’t have to say everything directly. You don’t need AI hallucination to connect things logically.

This not understanding "understanding". > maths are internally coherent and entirely theoretical Nope. This kind of wish-washy thinking is not what we mean by understanding. https:…

Sorry, but this is only partially informed. 1. The U.S. produces a massive share of global manufactured goods, ranking second globally behind China in total value added. 2. Only lo…

This is a vacuous argument. If everything is a “probabilistic input output machine” then what exactly are you claiming? You should look into mathematical definitions of probability…

Banning social media for kids before banning junk food for kids when you have a childhood obesity/health crisis just shows which companies greased the hands that made the laws http…

That's for your safety and well-being citizen. Sometimes less information is more information.

Usually these commenters are not from the US but get energized by US topics and misunderstand scale of things. E.g., they come from countries with a single nationalized entity for …

Look up when American companies got banned and when TikTok and Huawei got banned. American companies have been banned decades earlier. > Also are you going to simply ignore the fac…

Doesn’t China heavily restrict competition in its domestic markets? Probably only North Korea is worse. China is one of the most restrictive countries but expects full access to US…

I think you are just agreeing with me and restating the inputs to my argument. I didn’t say LLMs are capable of zero reasoning. An approximation is just an approximation no matter …

This is a great resource https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handbook_of_Automated_Reasonin...

It is not semantics. For decades, logic and CS researchers have known what reasoning is. LLM folks suddenly can’t claim an approximation of that is what constitutes full scale reas…

Don't humans make mistakes too? Never understood this argument. Humans get simple multiplication wrong often, so ok for computers to make mistakes multiplying numbers?

Much much worse: see Tibet or Hong Kong

As someone from India and someone who knows people from Tibet, Chinese hegemony will be much much worse. There is no HN equivalent in China where users advocate that US hegemony wi…

Did you read the links I attached? Are you saying China is better in human rights? Read the news in the past few years?

Who said blatant distillation was wrong? It just shows that Chinese “labs” are dependent on the US. Also, from a scientific perspective, distillation is decades old and contributes…

*Shuts off Internet access to Chinese labs (womp womp, no blatant distillation of US models)*

> because they're so much better cars than our domestic brands Is that objectively true? True after factoring in harms they do to human rights and the environment? Nope. https://ww…

Isn't the median income per capita higher in the US. European companies are likewise free to pay tariffs or not do business. EU does much more to protect its market compared to US.…

Not really. Go ask someone in Tibet/HongKong/Taiwan/Japan/India if China isn't breaking rules and bullying them. If China had US's powers/economy, it would be a much bigger bully. …

China goes even further lol https://m.economictimes.com/industry/renewables/china-wto-co...

No country in the world is full free market economy. It is always a spectrum. We are discussing Chinese models. Now look at how much foreign competition the Chinese government prev…

I replied to a comment with a structured informal proof on HN. A well established user here was adamant that I used AI because apparently humans never ever wrote proofs. This was a…