Viewing profile — thedoctor_o
thedoctor_o
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 3:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 125
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thedoctor_o
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41659473
I used to do plug-ins because it scratched an itch to code & provide things that'd be of use to others which when you've got a job to pay for that free time then it's less of an is…
-
comment
Comment #41659404
There were winamp3 / modern 5.x skins which were freeform in nature so could be all sorts of shapes or not depending on what the skinner wanted it to be like. With 5.x still suppor…
-
comment
Comment #41651293
They were never going to remove that as this is all about only them benefiting from free dev resources.
-
comment
Comment #41645773
I didn't see anything wrong with asking about it & I as don't really use HN I'm not sure of what the expectations, etc are on here. So imho its all good from my view point.
-
comment
Comment #41645753
They're very unlikely to have that as I don't remember it falling under the remit of things to be collated when things were sold from aol to what now calls itself "winamp" - they p…
-
comment
Comment #41645738
It was either sell it & shoutcast or kill both off since aol in 2013 was changing & there's lots of other projects under them at that time which were killed off instead of what was…
-
comment
Comment #41645703
They dumped the prior dev team over a year ago (the ones that added the nft plug-in & fanzone crap) & it is mostly a ploy to get a free dev team as was speculated when the whole "s…
-
comment
Comment #41640716
They've worded it just as they intended imho (ignoring the confusion over fork aspect) as it's how to ensure that they're still in charge & to prevent anything derivative as they r…
-
comment
Comment #41640633
It's just a habit I have when I'm replying to things so I'll try to remember to avoid doing it on here.
-
comment
Comment #41639240
The history section just above the prior properties section is what's now the case with winamp & shoutcast under unrelated organisations nowadays. Though it's all a bit murky as ra…
-
comment
Comment #41638906
llama group / "winamp" don't own shoutcast anymore as that was all sold off a year or so ago to azerion as part of changing audiovalley into llama group. -dro
-
comment
Comment #41638592
Those names were some of the original devs & they're the ones who put it in the easter egg on the about dialog that it relates to as a hacker-like joke. The source code is what aol…
-
comment
Comment #41637936
That'd mean they'd have to do more work then necessary & there'd at most only ever be what went back to the stripped down 5.666 code deliverable they got after it was sold on from …
-
comment
Comment #41637844
What has been "provided" is the stripped down 5.666 source bundle given to radionomy when sold on from AOL & the end result of their iterations up to the 5.9.2 release. So it's mad…
-
comment
Comment #41067719
No legit project could ever make use of the leaked source code even if it was from just before the end of the pre-sale AOL era so the person who did that never actually helped anyo…
-
comment
Comment #41067623
source available is not the same as open source nor have any terms been provided on what that'd actually be other than it's seemingly just about them getting a free dev team or loo…
-
comment
Comment #41067587
Because they primarily wanted shoutcast (ironic since they sold that off last year & got played in the process of doing all of that) which meant taking winamp with it. It's all a m…
-
comment
Comment #32782109
I had been doing that much more early on along with replacing some of the plug-ins & dlls. After a point the reality dawned that I was replacing so much that I was on the road to m…
-
comment
Comment #32780642
A feature that Winamp has had since September 2005... -dro
-
comment
Comment #32780306
Most of the crashes tend to be due to the parts re-used from 5.666. Also it's a preview build (aka public beta) so it can & will be unstable. As for what place it has, I'm going to…
-
comment
Comment #32779399
It's a gradual reimplementation whilst using some of the pre-compiled 5.666 exe / dll (how much depends on the build being used) with the end goal for WACUP to not require the 5.66…
-
comment
Comment #30288977
No offence taken. I would just rather than waiting around for those many willing devs (most of which seem to be web devs rather than native client devs from my past 8yrs experience…
-
comment
Comment #30288737
It is going to end up as a clone (as per the banner text on the site) but when I started out I didn't expect the lot that owned Winamp to fuck it up so much & abandon it. Every bui…
-
comment
Comment #30282423
It seems that there's a reasonable implication of nft's or other aspects of the web3.0 stuff based on what's been found recently -> https://www.reddit.com/r/winamp/comments/soqig1/…
-
comment
Comment #30282414
5.666 was the last full release of 'classic' Winamp. What is currently offered is an incomplete 5.8 beta that's "not an on-going project" (which is what was stated on their website…