Viewing profile — thatjoeoverthr
thatjoeoverthr
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 2:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,149
- Public activity
- 340 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About thatjoeoverthr
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49220568
This. Who cares about TV?
-
comment
Comment #49190639
It has been for years. The actual audience for a great deal of text you see is Google’s ranking system. Look up any recipe and ask yourself who reads the ten paragraph story time a…
-
comment
Comment #49190620
It’s natural to the fact it’s the same model. Everyone has tics, and when a given model is asked to write millions of texts, they become visible. But! Some portion of the audience …
-
comment
Comment #49163013
I'm a lifetime computer guy with broad, cross-domain experience. Now going hard into deep learning and language modelling since late 2021. I'm looking to make myself useful in this…
-
comment
Comment #49161818
If you decided at the outset they're of equal value to a $20/mo AI, lay them off.
-
comment
Comment #49088507
I’m having a great time with an NVIDIA 3090. 24 GB RAM will run a lot of neat models. But at zero you can for sure just do CPU until you build a project ambitious enough.
-
comment
Comment #49083078
Thanks for sharing the real one!
-
comment
Comment #49080614
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #49080550
Correct. Ideal. The story deserves zero time. In this way, I am in agreement with its publisher.
-
comment
Comment #49066414
It’s not. It’s very simple, but you like to say “circular reasoning”. Maybe you heard it in debate class. There is unlimited slop. I decide what to read _without reading it_. So do…
-
comment
Comment #49066385
It doesn’t matter which model it was sampled from. In any case, time isn’t fungible. I consider censuring it substantially more valuable use of time than reading it. And it’s defin…
-
comment
Comment #49060968
Oh, you think it’s just this story? The cost of reading slop is infinity. No thanks.
-
comment
Comment #49060954
Not all arguments can be evaluated rigorously. Life is too short. They will be filtered on heuristics. No choice. This text was obviously randomly sampled from a popular, off the s…
-
comment
Comment #48938945
Sufficiently advanced AI use is probably fine. The slop everyone complains about has certain tells specifically due to some combination of the following: - The author is conducting…
-
comment
Comment #48911068
So are all the other shady websites.
-
comment
Comment #48891588
Seems absurd to run a COTS agent at token rates to "play" a game. Like watching the computer beat its meat. Building your own models for it would be an eye-opener though. Learn a l…
-
comment
Comment #48891561
This more-or-less ended with 3D. The N64, mid-90s, had a novel 3D accelerator (heavily programmable, a kind of a proto-GPU). Its successor went with ATI. The Dreamcast had a PowerV…
-
comment
Comment #48890635
The PS3 is one of a handful of systems that actually had a special processor. The NES and Genesis had common desktop CPUs. The PS1, 2 and N64 had MIPS processors which were in heav…
-
comment
Comment #48841677
Thanks. The other guy asked if the IQ deniers are “in the room with us right now”.
-
comment
Comment #48838751
Cue the IQ denier deniers
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48565910
Recently I have the SEO guy governing the mostly static, public site with Claude Code. He loves it but you would never imagine the level of mental illness Claude comes up with. If …
-
comment
Comment #48551929
This strand of philosowank is just there to promote the idea you need to kill for the greater good. The only trolly problem that matters is brake maintenance.
-
comment
Comment #48530724
Unwise design. “It talks, CSRs talk, it’s the same thing”. The fact CSRs talk is incidental. Nobody contacts support to talk. Customer service is a kind of “exception handler” for …
-
comment
Comment #48529381
Last time I was in Germany I saw what appeared to be homeless children