Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tharant

tharant

HN member
Joined
Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 2:35 PM UTC
HN karma
53
Public activity
68 items

About tharant

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49182707

    How long ago was it that you tried FSD? My car (HW4) had a lot difficulty like this in the early days of FSD 11 but over the past thirty months it's gone from "good at highway driv…

  2. comment
    Comment #44933338

    When you’re digging around in tens to hundreds of PCs each day, the odds of zapping something are higher. I’ve killed a few chips and boards.

  3. comment
    Comment #44929505

    Hi, it’s me.

  4. comment
    Comment #44728998

    I can find no such requirement in the App Store Guidelines. Or is there anecdotal evidence somewhere?

  5. comment
    Comment #44539576

    Sure, the model would not “know” about your example, but that’s not the point; the penultimate[0] goal is for the model to figure out the method signature on its own just like a hu…

  6. comment
    Comment #43934048

    Please stop giving me project ideas. :)

  7. comment
    Comment #43914300

    > In the very narrow fields where I have a deep understanding, LLM output is mostly garbage > Thus I have to assume that for any topic I do not fully understand - which is the vast…

  8. comment
    Comment #43913754

    > A use-case that can be carefully considered requires more knowledge about the use-case than the LLM I would tend to agree with that assertion… > it requires you to understand the…

  9. comment
    Comment #43910895

    It sounds like the engineer may have little/no experience with concurrency; a lot of folks (myself included) sometime struggle with how various systems handle concurrency/paralleli…

  10. comment
    Comment #43910789

    In my experience, and for use-cases that are carefully considered, language models are not confidently wrong a majority of the time. The trick is understanding the tool and using i…

  11. comment
    Comment #43910689

    I don’t know for certain (he’s no longer around) but I suspect he did. The prevalence of folks who nowadays believe that Gen-AI makes everything worse suggests to me that not much …

  12. comment
    Comment #43910341

    > I really fear that a number of engineers are going to us GPT to avoid thinking. They view it as a shortcut to problem solve and it isn't. How is this sentiment not different from…

  13. comment
    Comment #43910221

    Again, is it possible you and the other party have (perhaps significantly) different mental models of the domain—or maybe different perspectives of the issues involved? I get that …

  14. comment
    Comment #43909773

    Is it possible that what happened was an impedance mismatch between you and the engineer such that they couldn’t grok what you told them but ChatGPT was able to describe it in a ma…

  15. comment
    Comment #43886985

    I was hoping for a Desk Set reference; thank you.

  16. comment
    Comment #43662888

    This is one reason I see to be optimistic about some of the hype around LLMs—folks will have to learn how to write high quality specifications and documentation in order to get goo…

  17. comment
    Comment #42896833

    > As for not merging the PR - why are you entitled to have a PR merged? I didn’t get entitlement vibes from the comment; I think the author believes the PR could have wide benefit,…

  18. comment
    Comment #42884532

    Although the practicality of what you described towards the end of your original comment conceptually demonstrates an MoE-like architecture, the fact that you explicitly mentioned …

  19. comment
    Comment #42652795

    > What expanded scope in new TVs is actually something I would care for? I think this is the crux of our confusion; you may not desire the expanded functionality but others certain…

  20. comment
    Comment #42651646

    I get your frustration with bugs but, what TVs (or any other consumer electronic product) aren’t reliant upon software for basic system control nowadays? Hardware isn’t inherently …

  21. comment
    Comment #42506539

    Sigh. It didn’t take 100 years to grow the ICE repair industry and I imagine you know that; I suspect you’re just being stubbornly argumentative for the sake of vanity. There’s alr…

  22. comment
    Comment #42506110

    >There are no parts from the OEs, there are no tools, the packs are not meant to be serviced, and it is SERIOUSLY DANGEROUS work. The same was true for the ICE vehicle third-party …

  23. comment
    Comment #42505680

    Are you suggesting that since the third-party EV repair industry is still in its infancy that EVs are therefore objectively bad? If so, how is that perspective different from any o…

  24. comment
    Comment #42459459

    > In our content, we don’t generally worry that someone is reading our inner dialogue… Really? Is that what’s wrong with me? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  25. comment
    Comment #42283057

    Have you seen the Tesla Model S Plaid, or the Lucid Air Saphire? Heck, even the supercar/hypercar market is slowly becoming predominantly BEV.