Viewing profile — tester34
tester34
HN member- Joined
- Fri, May 15, 2020, 10:59 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,007
- Public activity
- 710 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tester34
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30112455
Just because in "real hacking" you can just smash somebody's head with crowbar untill he gives you the password? That's fair, but just take a look at how complex latest biggest hac…
-
comment
Comment #30112429
Good/Clean code is context dependent kernel's code is terrible mess by java/c# web app standards (dependency injection, interfaces, mockability, testability, etc) Even C#'s compile…
-
comment
Comment #30098904
top hackers when it comes to crimes? then probably yea, but when it comes to skills? I'd say that they're not really that unknown - https://ctftime.org/
-
comment
Comment #30021271
Is WASM going to replace: Lua, JS and LLV IRM?
-
comment
Comment #30020823
I've never bought smartphone because felt no need but the only things that make me really, really strongly consider getting smartphone is some form of Maps - let it be Google or so…
-
comment
Comment #29904148
>What I mean is, the lost productivity of waiting around for slack to load a channel is essentially outsourcing this cost difference via poor performance. What makes you think that…
-
comment
Comment #29904113
>Nobody is using Blazor. Hmm, I don't think this is true. Also this is kind of different beast - WASM has some limitations that need to be overcome
-
comment
Comment #29891925
idk Google Maps performance seems to be way worse I do wonder how's the WASM performance
-
comment
Comment #29875041
Honestly nothing gives as much experience/knowledge as trying to write it yourself and then reading about how other people do it e.g VS Code blog https://code.visualstudio.com/blog…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #29837481
Did the game name start with 'T' letter?
-
comment
Comment #29836486
Monads :P
-
comment
Comment #29806306
I share this sentiment, I do find Leetcode and stuff incredibly boring Meanwhile writing your own libraries, parsers, compilers, oh boi. Additionally it gave me waaay more than LC …
-
comment
Comment #29806190
but of course 3/4 days a week those 12-13h? I worked in system like this and I actually loved that, especially that those were night shifts I'd really take 3(+1)x 12h nights over 5…
-
comment
Comment #29795354
Yea, that's what I meant What if we allowed HTTP GET Body?
-
comment
Comment #29795333
>redefine GET as having a semantic body because a bazillion different implementations (clients, servers and middle boxes) probably become non-compliant. So what actually? apps that…
-
comment
Comment #29794943
What is the difference between this and allowing HTTP GET with Body?
-
comment
Comment #29792358
What does algorithm (approach) has to SIMD / Hardware intrinsics?
-
comment
Comment #29780195
>which is (maxWordlength*26) long. Each segment of 26 represents a >^We're going to assume normalized words, which are all lower case and no punctuation, comprised of English lette…
-
comment
Comment #29779757
>The site is basically a game if you're optimizing for points, and it's better designed than reddit because you have to actually know things to get them. Haha. Actually HN seems to…
-
comment
Comment #29779608
>The busses no longer accept cash in my city, you need to buy a prepaid card from a transit hub or from one of their partner retailers. So I need to get a ride to the store to get …
-
comment
Comment #29779551
>Captchas, Two-factor SMS, password rules What would replace those? Abusive/Maniac users are the problem too
-
comment
Comment #29702566
Yea, I meant Nuget iirc there were some changes around .NET Framework -> .NET Core to how does it work (where packages are stored) and that's why I said that since .NET Core I didn…
-
comment
Comment #29702032
I had opportunity to use Roslyn's SDK APIs to build some tools that operated on full source code or uncompilable code parts and it really feels as if that was written with tooling …
-
comment
Comment #29701806
I don't think you're talking about same thing Just because JVM or CLR are complex, then it *doesn't* mean that writting good C# / Java requires you to be proficient at CLR/JVM lvl …