Viewing profile — terminus
terminus
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 22, 2009, 9:45 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 191
- Public activity
- 97 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About terminus
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39338942
> That said, Remarkable the company has been fairly shitty. They removed the links to the dev tools, and don't really respond to requests for source that they are obligated to rele…
-
comment
Comment #37475903
You could come up with a scenario, sure. Bad in law though. [1] Another scenario you could come up with is a future climate catastrophe, where millions die and/or are displaced bec…
-
comment
Comment #19142203
Are you seriously saying that there are two sides to the whether women are chattel or not? What's funny is that your specious analogies try to equate this argument -- for more free…
-
comment
Comment #19141641
> If we enforce some morals and not others in our app stores, who exactly do we choose as the arbiters of morality? U.S. public opinion? Chinese public opinion? Maybe the U.N? I ag…
-
comment
Comment #18888846
Has anybody done any work on mapping die shots onto the microarchitecture features? The only thing I've found is work by this guy (about a decade old now): http://chip-architect.co…
-
comment
Comment #15730788
Thanks for the suggestion. You are right of course.
-
comment
Comment #15727661
I'd say, speech leading to violence is like pornography; you know it when you see it. And I would refer you to the examples I have in the comment. Given the subjective nature of th…
-
comment
Comment #15727646
Yes, and as I said above: good for Twitter. However, I notice that you don't have much to say about my argument against speech leading to violence. What do you think about that.
-
comment
Comment #15727347
I see a lot of people arguing about free speech and censorship here. I'm not sure how anybody is being censored here -- given that we are only debating verification. People are not…
-
comment
Comment #15727291
> But punitive action against people you disagree with is simply unacceptable! Where your argument falls down is in just reducing this to "people you disagree with." Nazis (even la…
-
comment
Comment #15143522
How is it black box? The OP posted a link to an article; in the discussion, I talk about how the tone of the article sounds reasonable to me. And, then I even give examples from th…
-
comment
Comment #15137957
> As an Oklahoman, I think it's a little strange when someone at a Canadian university writes an article funded by the Rockefeller Foundation about "failing" Oklahoma, and has writ…
-
comment
Comment #15137888
Ignoring the gratuitous insult, here's the NCA 2014 report (the report itself is about the impact of climate change; Chapter 2 lays out the case for climate change caused by humans…
-
comment
Comment #15137041
> I don't see anything constructive about his tone, nor do I find any new ideas in his writing. Umm... the article is making the case for how Oklahoma is failing it's people. A cas…
-
comment
Comment #15134934
The argument was right below the line you replied to. Perhaps try reading? A google search for "case for climate change" would also give you meaningful results. But, you already kn…
-
comment
Comment #14168916
Well said. I'd add Soylent to that list -- they started with sustainable food and now they are pushing Soylent Drink which is basically a throwaway bottle for every 400 calories.
-
comment
Comment #13757596
Probably this one: https://www.gwern.net/Story%20Of%20Your%20Life
-
comment
Comment #11924676
> How is the original sentence meaningless? "We think you will like this" (rephrasing) definitely has a meaning. The original sentence is meaningless because it's marketing drivel.…
-
comment
Comment #11273394
Microsoft's strategies haven't changed much since (or at all) since these, circa 1999, Halloween documents: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween_documents
-
comment
Comment #9828204
I'd posit this is: https://www.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-GB&q=Reddit+alte...
-
comment
Comment #9651014
> We believe the customer should be in control of their own information. You might like these so-called free services, but we don’t think they’re worth having your email, your sear…
-
comment
Comment #9489078
You are right about Android and Xerox's GUI. (There were others who were thinking in a similar direction (Openmoko for one), and I would argue that both of these things would have …
-
comment
Comment #9475437
This is not about Android or iPhone. Or Google or whoever. I'll happily acknowledge that Apple sells well thought out products. I stand by what I said earlier. There's too much of …
-
comment
Comment #9474717
> Apple is one of the most important and influential tech companies in the world right now. No. You are confusing admired with influential.
-
comment
Comment #9469286
Ye, Gods. Yet another Apple story. They are a for profit (and quite a lot of it) corporation that makes shiny gadgets. Why do we keep talking about them incessantly? If we are not …