Viewing profile — tentaTherapist
tentaTherapist
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 26, 2017, 4:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 46
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tentaTherapist
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15472668
This is such a ridiculously inefficient means of raising money, for everyone involved. What would it take to just get people to pay for the services that they use, out of gratitude…
-
comment
Comment #15472649
I... why? There was no need to compare this talented guy with an over-the-top, megalomaniacal and egocentric scientist from a sci-fi cartoon.
-
comment
Comment #15470609
Can you and GP please avoid turning this into a battle to see which is the worse country?
-
comment
Comment #15458528
You say 'beloved Objective-C'. Sorry if this is really off topic, but is objc_msgsend (the whole late-binding thing) or anything else about Objective-C particularly appealing? Mayb…
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #15396652
Because it's a term that means nothing but makes for good marketing.
-
comment
Comment #15349757
Nope, this is exactly what low-level Rust code should look like.
-
comment
Comment #15346141
I agree with your message but you're way too harsh. At least these guys, unlike antivaxxers, have genuine concerns. Maybe they're not considering the even worse alternatives in the…
-
comment
Comment #15346100
But you'd have to do that in Rust too, or at least use a library like petgraph, because Rust hates cycles even more than C++.
-
comment
Comment #15346098
But then your program uses slow, cache-unfriendly and much-reviled reference counting. I'd even prefer Ocaml and its fully-featured GC if C++ is only fast in artificial benchmarks …
-
comment
Comment #15346050
Yeah, but unwrap is very, very explicitly marked, and its use is discouraged, and unlike null it's nothing close to an undesirable edge case on every single pointer. Edit: In my pe…
-
comment
Comment #15339345
Uh, inherently faster as in, there's nothing about the API design that makes it easier to optimize.
-
comment
Comment #15333208
Showing them all seems a bit impossible because the number would blow up really quickly, wouldn't it? Maybe it could categorise them, but that could be misleading, too... I don't k…
-
comment
Comment #15333003
That is a very well-named problem.
-
comment
Comment #15331907
Like you said, VanillaJS isn't inherently faster than any of these frameworks, but the cost to the user (and the increased API surface) isn't worth that tiny improvement in code cl…
-
comment
Comment #15314790
> the employee is then forced to prioritise their work themselves and only focus on the pieces of work that align with their incentives. Which should align with the company incenti…
-
comment
Comment #15274243
So that people don't get angry?
-
comment
Comment #15274235
If you give me code and I don't run it, I don't really think I'm at fault here. If this was opt-in maybe they'd receive more sympathy, but as it stands wasting my electricity to ma…
-
comment
Comment #15271118
But if most users have integrated graphics, and even with dedicated graphics cards the improvement is nowhere near an order of magnitude, would it be much better?
-
comment
Comment #15270619
There isn't any LLVM support yet, and it doesn't look like anyone's working on it.
-
comment
Comment #15270595
Honestly that sounds really creepy.
-
comment
Comment #15270580
Why use hashes instead of, e.g., semver, or hash + patch version, so that you could patch Heartbleed easily?
-
comment
Comment #15270557
And you fix these errors as they arise, adding platform-specific hacks to the library as necessary. Your product still ends up much smaller and better-performing than the others.
-
comment
Comment #15270543
Why not ship an installer that checks for and appropriately installs DLLs?