Viewing profile — temp9251
temp9251
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 12, 2013, 3:53 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 69
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About temp9251
Temporary and Anonymous accounts, protected by SSL, are the only way to speak freely without risk of consequence, and I shall continue to avail myself of their powers whenever discussing sensitive topics.
The true atrocity is not the abuses of surveillance, it's the immeasurable impact on free speech. You can count how many suffered at the hands of the system, but how many more shut up instead of risking future opportunities?
I say fuck the surveillance, fuck the [REDACTED], fuck self censorship. If you feel pressure to avoid discussing something, it's time to participate anonymously.
Karma and worldly prestige are a small price to pay for the ability to speak completely freely.
============================================
A fun experiment, but I'm no evangelical. Time to don my tin foil hat and return to intentional obscurity.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6548498
Google has started resorting to some odd and arguably evil tricks as well: http://i.imgur.com/gqJAfH2.png "Your channel will get a new page on Google+" only appears after checking …
-
comment
Comment #6110111
Is there any hard proof that marijuana prices have been affected by the availability of medical marijuana? Further north they certainly haven't (medical marijuana sells for more ),…
-
comment
Comment #5968446
You seem to be conflating PRISM with NSA's entire SIGINT operation, I see a lot of people doing that. PRISM is one out of 504 programs that collectively obtain vast amounts of info…
-
comment
Comment #5896387
Section 702 was written, and has been interpreted, to have very few restrictions. 1) It bars the NSA from collecting data on people unless "reasonably believed to be located outsid…
-
comment
Comment #5896348
Error in 2nd to last paragraph: bars the NSA from collecting data on people unless ... i.e. excluding Americans from collection vs excluding non-Americans.
-
comment
Comment #5894859
From my reading I understand that the comment on being able to wiretap absolutely anyone was on the basis that he was a sysadmin. He had write access to databases of people who's c…
-
comment
Comment #5894805
I disagree, some key points were clarified. To wit - 1. Encryption works, but "endpoint security" is easily defeated. 2. "US Persons do enjoy ... one very weak technical protection…
-
comment
Comment #5892755
tl;dr citation 9. If nothing else, read that. Great article. The massive scale of the NSA's operations are hardly being disputed (logging of US-based backbones, underwater cables, …
-
comment
Comment #5887366
I'm 20 now, and I think I'm smart. When I was 15 I did as well, but now I think I was pretty stupid at the time. No doubt the pattern will continue at 25.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #5885513
Do you know more than I do about Microsoft's disclosures to the US Government (effectively nothing) or is it an educated guess that what they receive is comparable with MAPP?
-
comment
Comment #5885477
It seems disingenuous to compare it to the disclosure to commercial vendors when the government is not listed as a MAPP partner. I have no clue what they actually disclose, but I d…
-
comment
Comment #5885404
Sen. Wyden is on said Committee, and asked Clapper a question that, in Clapper's own words, he answered with a "least untruth" statement that was "too cute by half". This can be ro…
-
comment
Comment #5885329
How would he know what are lies? He isn't on the Senate Intelligence Committee, the 15 people in Congress privileged enough to know the truth.
-
comment
Comment #5885131
"the NSA does not use that program to keep geolocation data" How does this mesh with the Verizon court order specifically demanding trunk identifiers for calls, which can be resolv…
-
comment
Comment #5885032
What makes you think PRISM collects data about everyone? BLARNEY/FAIRVIEW are their "upstream data collection" programs. PRISM isn't one of their dragnets, so it confuses me that p…
-
comment
Comment #5872463
According to the Guardian article that broke the news, "[a] 2005 court ruling judged that cell site location data – the nearest cell tower a phone was connected to – was also trans…