Viewing profile — tediousgraffit1
tediousgraffit1
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 01, 2022, 5:18 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 51 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tediousgraffit1
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219601
maybe I'm missing something, I'll admit I haven't made it through the whole smug article, but critiquing knowledge work, especially IT work, just a few years after that field yield…
-
comment
Comment #48926296
I think there's some nuance here that a lot of these convos dont make plain - are we talking about just using 'ai' in the military broadly, or are we specifically talking about ful…
-
comment
Comment #48331745
> at a fraction of the cost of human workers. herein lies the rub
-
comment
Comment #46760559
> I am also dealing with a number of emergencies, including a lockdown at the Minneapolis courthouse because of protest activity, the defiance of several court orders by ICE, and t…
-
comment
Comment #46359287
> It used to be that a well-written document was a proof-of-work that the author thought things through (or at least spent some time thinking about it). I think you hit the nail on…
-
comment
Comment #46357807
This is a trust issue. If someone I trust hands me a big pr, I focus on the important details. If someone i dont trust hands me a big pr, i just reject it and ask them to break the…
-
comment
Comment #46357733
Nowhere in here does it indicate that the generated plan was wrong or broken. I dont care if you use ai to write. I care if you write well. If the author trusted the other person, …
-
comment
Comment #46357588
I guess this is more broad than like code triage and sites like that? Hard to tell cause I dont want to sign up to see what's in it.
-
comment
Comment #46357526
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-
comment
Comment #46351431
I Don't Know, Timmy, Being God Is a Big Responsibility https://qntm.org/responsibilit
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46327810
ok but how does it work though? Is this seriously just passing the titles to some llm with a prompt like 'roast this'? is it reading the actual content of the link as well?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #45919794
By that logic, we should ban lettuce[1] next [1] https://www.science.org/content/article/e-coli-outbreak-trac...
-
comment
Comment #44958786
lol, if the primary outcome is better documentation...i'll take it
-
comment
Comment #44883299
Yeah, this is a good blog article and a great pitch for this service. There was a discussion yesterday about where to look for the next github...
-
comment
Comment #44756980
> You’re not rejecting a bad engineer, you’re rejecting someone who doesn’t perform well while being watched. a related thing here is that I've long believed that remote work posit…
-
comment
Comment #44756909
I'm curious how you would respond to the folks who are concerned that asking people to 'just do the work' in an interview are asking for unpaid labor, and that's unfair? (post made…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #43730950
Because we can still do things computers can't and that's interesting
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #43582252
this is the key idea right here. LLMs are not replacing good coders, they're electric yak shavers that we should all learn how to use. The value add is real, and incremental, not r…
-
comment
Comment #43551289
I really like this, this is the perfect size project for exploring a new piece of tech. I especially like that you implemented an actual cli and not just tests.