Viewing profile — teachingassist
teachingassist
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 07, 2021, 11:58 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 846
- Public activity
- 305 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About teachingassist
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27460865
> All of which still ignores how wildly unlikely it is that such a high degree of similarity occurs by chance. It is wildly unlikely that I should exist through the process of evol…
-
comment
Comment #27460754
> Even if I hadn't, what point to claiming authority on that basis? Oh, this was a direct response to the fact that you repeatedly implied that I was ignorant and hadn't done basic…
-
comment
Comment #27460743
> no sign of apprehending I apprehended it perfectly well; I'm still in disagreement, since my argument is unaffected. > so contradict all available evidence It doesn't, and that's…
-
comment
Comment #27460350
> Happily, the paper does not only do that! Yes, happily! Since, as I was saying in my first comment: I didn't agree with this part of the paper's abstract being relevant evidence,…
-
comment
Comment #27460263
Even with all this 'trivial literature review', there still remains the possibility three fish might have randomly walked [or non-randomly walked] into the same solution with the s…
-
comment
Comment #27460118
> On what basis do you hold any such expectation?... The paper explicitly contrasts its subject with several examples of convergent evolution producing functionally equivalent, but…
-
comment
Comment #27460024
> that three species should have a near-identical sequence coding for a near-identical protein suggests rather strongly that this version of the gene arose in one species and was t…
-
comment
Comment #27459299
Yours is an anti-capitalist take which I don't see as a criticism of VW specifically here. The reason this service can potentially exist is only because Tesla is charging such a hi…
-
comment
Comment #27458488
> no one has really approached this type of bet sizing from a rigorous perspective beyond the relatively simple Kelly Criterion. Kelly Criterion takes into account your bankroll at…
-
comment
Comment #27454433
This comment is right - and the study began shortly after Ohio's peak of infections. As such, most infected participants would have been recently infected in a situation with low a…
-
comment
Comment #27451736
> This is a "no brown M&Ms" kind of violation. I see it more as a "no brwn M&Ms" violation. We would all assume the intent was to say no brown M&Ms, rather than imagine that no act…
-
comment
Comment #27449780
> It would push us a lot closer to a world where people don't own anything anymore besides their own houses (maybe not even that) and the government owns everything. I'm really str…
-
comment
Comment #27446888
London's transport strikes have been shown to ultimately benefit the wider economy, as people have broken out of their local maximums and found more efficient ways to travel around…
-
comment
Comment #27446789
Ctrl-F "federal government" suggests otherwise. This is now really a bad faith argument. You've moved the goalposts (again), and declared that your new goal wasn't met (when, in fa…
-
comment
Comment #27445257
> In 1990, twelve countries in Europe had a wealth tax. Today, there are only three The "Today,..." claim is is simply false (both when the article was written, and now). Wikipedia…
-
comment
Comment #27440071
I would say in general that you want to motivate money to move as much as possible - and the problem with excessive wealth is that the money is not moving. In an ideal world, I wou…
-
comment
Comment #27439188
First, this is not true. I live in a country in Europe and I paid a wealth tax today, in fact. Second, please re-read my comment above as to why you might have understood that.
-
comment
Comment #27438838
> Basically zero support for it. Wealth taxes are extremely well-supported, despite the media as an industry [and politicians] being owned by people strongly motivated to campaign …
-
comment
Comment #27437460
Regarding the government's ownership of real estate, I suggest you are simply mistaken, e.g.: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bisnow/2017/04/11/solving-the-m...
-
comment
Comment #27437358
As best I can tell, Bitcoin has moved more than [it has so far today, ~6%] on 42 days in the last year, and 38 days the year before that, considering open-to-open values. 10% daily…
-
comment
Comment #27437211
I'd wager it was passed as a message in the ANOM app. I don't think it's coincidence that these were news-worthy on the same day.
-
comment
Comment #27437086
> once the government can own stocks and portions of real estate, I'm sure it will seek to incrementally increase its benefit from doing so. There's nothing stopping the government…
-
comment
Comment #27436369
> But....shares are useless until sold. This is clearly untrue. At least they have use in the ongoing option to sell. I can use them as collateral to borrow at least as much as, an…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #27435969
OK. You seem to be agreeing that this would be a fine system with those caveats. So: Exemptions specifically covering residency already exist in finance law. If you go bankrupt, yo…