Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tawpKek

tawpKek

HN member
Joined
Tue, Apr 12, 2016, 11:04 PM UTC
HN karma
16
Public activity
13 items

About tawpKek

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #13638021

    >Self-interested people often work together to achieve great things. Why should this be the case, when it is in their best interest to just care about their own wellbeing and disre…

  2. comment
    Comment #12988215

    I think the idea that speech is anti-fragile works to a point, but is ultimately a bit naive about the way that power structures and language works. Its entirely possible to limit …

  3. comment
    Comment #12980483

    Thats really not what I'm talking about. I understand the push back against "SJWs" and those in the language policing community. That said, telling someone to get in the oven, whic…

  4. comment
    Comment #12973047

    I think its worth asking here: Why do we value free speech? Is it because we would like a variety of ideas to be heard, even if some of them are unsavory in the current social land…

  5. comment
    Comment #12353563

    This trash algorithm identifies me as "very liberal". Excuse me, I am a leftist, not some modern liberal tyvm.

  6. comment
    Comment #11671761

    >The web and FB has made us dumber- we point and click and no longer have to search and think. That is a bold and baseless statement.

  7. comment
    Comment #11668264

    Interesting you mention the fact about it being poorly displayed. I would say it is, but not because you don't often see this frontal view. As you may or may not know, the sculptur…

  8. comment
    Comment #11661119

    You could draw a parallel between this and the tabacco free pharmacy push: http://cvshealth.com/thought-leadership/cvs-health-perspecti...

  9. comment
    Comment #11551778

    Vintage thread on consensus cracking: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread429408/pg1

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #11498131

    Whoops, there was a typo in my post. I meant to write do they need that (meaning a physically accurate bookshelf) to be understood as books. >That's the fun of it! No, I am the arb…

  12. comment
    Comment #11489675

    w/r/t the pedantic point, it seems you're a bit stuck in the prison of the literal here. Sure, the books couldn't sit on a real actual shelf, but do they really need to to be under…

  13. comment
    Comment #11484404

    That, right there, is a damning indictment of your understanding of modernist design and art. Visual communication achieved acclaim because it prioritized functionality over decora…