Viewing profile — taway32r41
taway32r41
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Sep 04, 2023, 8:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 16
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About taway32r41
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37491359
> Why do they reverse some claims but not others? I guess that is the question. I'll be interested in the bank's reply.
-
comment
Comment #37491343
Honestly I don't know. I copied and pasted the text and punctuation from the original document and it put them there. I also didn't do the research. The office of Senator Warren di…
-
comment
Comment #37488011
I'm not going to do a lot of research here but one thing I remember reading about was an uptick in Android Ransomware. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2020/10/08/sop.…
-
comment
Comment #37487694
"Banks are not repaying customers who contest “unauthorized” Zelle payments – potentially violating federal law and CFPB rules." I suppose you and Senator Warren have different def…
-
comment
Comment #37487147
The U.S. Senate begs to differ. Consumers defrauded on Zelle are left high and dry by the banks that created it [pdf] (senate.gov) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37438934
-
comment
Comment #37480519
Like with most languages, learning the language is easy. Learning all the libraries, especially the undocumented proprietary ones, is the hard part.
-
comment
Comment #37479477
I never understood this mentality myself. I use parts libraries all the time. Whether or not I drew the symbol, I still have to double check it as it's not like every symbol I ever…
-
comment
Comment #37440451
I think the general idea is credit cards take care of the card holders. They've certainly always have taken care of me. And merchants are supposed to take care of themselves by rai…
-
comment
Comment #37440112
I don't think that one can't add security and verification, etc. I think the issue is those things are not free and it is supposed that adding them would just transform Zelle into …
-
comment
Comment #37415288
> SiFive was working on CoC (theorum prover) extensions to validate designs using formal methods. THAT sounds fascinating, but I'm not sure how they would monetize it. Synopsys see…
-
comment
Comment #37408934
I definitely agree with the primary point, "building a chip that meets specfic requirements we got from the customer" is not easy and is what matters. However, RISCV cores abound. …
-
comment
Comment #37384574
Here's a class at MIT that takes undergraduates who don't even know verilog and at then end of the class they have a mostly passable RV32I. Admittedly pushing that through VLSI CAD…