Viewing profile — tasdfqwer0897
tasdfqwer0897
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 19, 2017, 9:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 92
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tasdfqwer0897
website: https://www.augustusodena.com/
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37931547
Hey I work at Adept and helped make this! Happy to answer questions. The thing I think is especially neat/notable is how simple you can make the model architecture while still gett…
-
comment
Comment #32845607
Yeah this is a good point! We are spending a lot of time thinking about reliability and it's true that existing models fall a little flat here. I think ultimately the key to making…
-
comment
Comment #32845044
Yeah, we did have to custom-build our own benchmarks. And we are not building a chatbot, we're building something collaborative that you can work with to accomplish the stuff you w…
-
comment
Comment #32845027
Thanks - glad you like it! I probably won't get to all of these but let me try a couple: 1. There's a spectrum (sort of) between using full on RL techniques and just doing sequence…
-
comment
Comment #32843420
We used a combination of human demonstrations and feedback data! You need custom software both to record the demonstrations and to represent the state of the Tool in a model-consum…
-
comment
Comment #32843403
Yes! We plan on putting out a more detailed technical post soon.
-
comment
Comment #32842992
Hey, I helped make this! Happy to answer any questions.
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28217643
> do you see improvements in Transformer or attention based architectures as essential... I do personally, but there is some disagreement about this in the field. In fact, I would …
-
comment
Comment #28217612
I personally agree that this experiment is evidence that there are certain problems that cannot be solved simply by making the models bigger, and one of the main research questions…
-
comment
Comment #28217596
Unfortunately not, but we do release both the programming dataset and the math questions dataset, so in principle you could try those out with one of the open-source models from e.…
-
comment
Comment #28217589
I think it might be a mistake to think that the model is not confident because its response is something a human might say if they were not confident. The model is 'just' completin…
-
comment
Comment #28217296
Hey, I am one of the lead authors of this paper. Happy to answer questions. This is a twitter thread going over the main results: https://twitter.com/gstsdn/status/1427794393373626…
- story
-
comment
Comment #23315314
We have been working on this recently on the Google Brain team. We are working both on synthesizing programs from scratch (see https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09030 for example) and on …
-
comment
Comment #19621546
This actually might have interesting connections to ideas from differential privacy. Maybe the work is derivative of a particular training image if we can easily predict the presen…
-
comment
Comment #19621502
So if you wave your hands enough, it seems like maybe there's an argument to be made that the weights of a trained GAN somehow correspond to a 'compilation' of the training data as…
-
comment
Comment #19621439
So you are worried that your existing attribution method is too focused on 'obvious' attributes and you want to see if you can make it focus on less obvious things? IIUC, that's so…
-
comment
Comment #19621428
Someone on the machine learning reddit asked me this: > Question: How does copyright work for GAN output? If I input 300,000 copyright protected photos of celebrities and generate …
-
comment
Comment #19621411
Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean by applicable loss functions? I'll answer what I think you're asking and you can tell me if I got it wrong: There's been a lot of effort spent on co…
-
comment
Comment #19621202
Hey, I wrote this! Happy to answer questions.