Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tangentstar

tangentstar

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 21, 2024, 6:53 PM UTC
HN karma
24
Public activity
19 items

About tangentstar

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40492152

    [flagged]

  2. comment
    Comment #40491997

    Not if the damages are presumed (e.g., if the false defamatory statement published to a third party consists of a claim that the plaintiff has a venereal disease, is unfit for thei…

  3. comment
    Comment #40471411

    Well, I’m glad at least I know the things that make you lose in court now. I’m appreciative for the lesson.

  4. comment
    Comment #40470679

    I interpret it completely differently given that the voice actor does not sound like SJ. 1. OpenAI wants to make a voice assistant. 2. They hire the voice actor. 3. Someone at Open…

  5. comment
    Comment #40469085

    Carbon Robotics has a tractor attachment system that burns weeds with lasers. Pests can’t be far behind.

  6. comment
    Comment #40461421

    If anyone at Spotify is reading this, I just cancelled my account. You guys deserve considerably less money than you have now, but this is the best I can do.

  7. comment
    Comment #40461232

    Heck, you could do it with a pair of alligator clips at a punch down panel. The telco was fun before everything went digital.

  8. comment
    Comment #40460877

    1. Advance medical directive 2. Plan for guardianship/conservator ship as appropriate 3. House owned by joint tenancy w/ right of survivorship or jusrisdiction’s equivalent 4. Tran…

  9. comment
    Comment #40460645

    You’re right that a random person’s voice is not IP, but SJ is not a random person. She’s much more like Mr. Waits or Ms. Milder than you or I. I don’t believe the burden would be …

  10. comment
    Comment #40460417

    The insurance company-driven model for industry specific safety improvement that worked so well for fire safety and auto safety has proven impossible because of three factors: 1. C…

  11. comment
    Comment #40460382

    The software company would argue that the lawbreaking hacker was a supervening cause, while the consumer would argue the criminal was foreseeable. In the case of security software,…

  12. comment
    Comment #40460287

    Fifty state insurance commissioners could make this more or less happen overnight, except to the extent firms are using something other than cyber coverage to pay ransoms. In my ey…

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #40447721

    Nothing quite like a contract’s consideration consisting solely of a pre-existing obligation. I wonder what they were thinking with that?

  15. comment
    Comment #40435749

    The “dial” on a rotary phone broke the connection in rapid sequence a number of times corresponding to the number dialed. If your dial broke, you could place calls by “flashing” th…

  16. comment
    Comment #40435717

    The first distinction I can think of is, “Who has agreed to the terms of service of the site being visited?”

  17. comment
    Comment #40435295

    No, voices can be exclusive. One good example is Bette Midler, who sued Ford in tort for misappropriation of voice and won on appeal to CA9. 849 F.2d 460.

  18. comment
    Comment #40432481

    Defamation is false speech published to others without requisite care for the truth. Libel is written defamation. Slander is spoken defamation.

  19. comment
    Comment #40432365

    In some jurisdictions, there is the concept of a limited purpose public figure. Libeling a CEO for his work as CEO might fall therein, while libeling him in the context of pro wres…