Viewing profile — tangentstar
tangentstar
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 21, 2024, 6:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 24
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About tangentstar
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40492152
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #40491997
Not if the damages are presumed (e.g., if the false defamatory statement published to a third party consists of a claim that the plaintiff has a venereal disease, is unfit for thei…
-
comment
Comment #40471411
Well, I’m glad at least I know the things that make you lose in court now. I’m appreciative for the lesson.
-
comment
Comment #40470679
I interpret it completely differently given that the voice actor does not sound like SJ. 1. OpenAI wants to make a voice assistant. 2. They hire the voice actor. 3. Someone at Open…
-
comment
Comment #40469085
Carbon Robotics has a tractor attachment system that burns weeds with lasers. Pests can’t be far behind.
-
comment
Comment #40461421
If anyone at Spotify is reading this, I just cancelled my account. You guys deserve considerably less money than you have now, but this is the best I can do.
-
comment
Comment #40461232
Heck, you could do it with a pair of alligator clips at a punch down panel. The telco was fun before everything went digital.
-
comment
Comment #40460877
1. Advance medical directive 2. Plan for guardianship/conservator ship as appropriate 3. House owned by joint tenancy w/ right of survivorship or jusrisdiction’s equivalent 4. Tran…
-
comment
Comment #40460645
You’re right that a random person’s voice is not IP, but SJ is not a random person. She’s much more like Mr. Waits or Ms. Milder than you or I. I don’t believe the burden would be …
-
comment
Comment #40460417
The insurance company-driven model for industry specific safety improvement that worked so well for fire safety and auto safety has proven impossible because of three factors: 1. C…
-
comment
Comment #40460382
The software company would argue that the lawbreaking hacker was a supervening cause, while the consumer would argue the criminal was foreseeable. In the case of security software,…
-
comment
Comment #40460287
Fifty state insurance commissioners could make this more or less happen overnight, except to the extent firms are using something other than cyber coverage to pay ransoms. In my ey…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #40447721
Nothing quite like a contract’s consideration consisting solely of a pre-existing obligation. I wonder what they were thinking with that?
-
comment
Comment #40435749
The “dial” on a rotary phone broke the connection in rapid sequence a number of times corresponding to the number dialed. If your dial broke, you could place calls by “flashing” th…
-
comment
Comment #40435717
The first distinction I can think of is, “Who has agreed to the terms of service of the site being visited?”
-
comment
Comment #40435295
No, voices can be exclusive. One good example is Bette Midler, who sued Ford in tort for misappropriation of voice and won on appeal to CA9. 849 F.2d 460.
-
comment
Comment #40432481
Defamation is false speech published to others without requisite care for the truth. Libel is written defamation. Slander is spoken defamation.
-
comment
Comment #40432365
In some jurisdictions, there is the concept of a limited purpose public figure. Libeling a CEO for his work as CEO might fall therein, while libeling him in the context of pro wres…